MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and sample collection

The study consisted of 94 cases diagnosed with LCH at the Department of Pathology, Children’s Hospital 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, from 2012 to 2018. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue with well-defined histology of LCH on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections and positive CD1a staining (using monoclonal antibody CD1a, clone 010, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) were collected. We analyzed the intensity of CD1a expression as low expression (moderate membrane and cytoplasmic staining) and high expression (strong membrane and cytoplasmic staining).

All paraffin blocks were well preserved and available for DNA sequencing. All slides were re-examined to confirm the diagnosis and to select the paraffin blocks for molecular testing. Clinical information, age, sex, location, histopathology, and risk organ were obtained.

Analysis of BRAF V600E mutation

Tumor cells were selected based on H&E slides and were targeted for DNA extraction by macrodissection scraping. DNA was isolated from a 5-μm-thick tumor using the ReliaPrep FFPE gDNA Miniprep System kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Amplification of the BRAF exon 15 was performed using TaKaRa Taq HotStart Polymerase (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) with primers BRAF-600F (5′-ACTCTTCATAATGCTTGCTC-3′) and BRAF-600R (5′-CCACAAAATGGATCCAGACA-3′). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) included initial denaturation at 98°C for 3 minutes followed by 45 cycles of 98°C for 10 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 40 seconds, with a final elongation of 72°C for 2 minutes. PCR product was purified enzymatically using the ExoSAP IT PCR Product Cleanup Reagent (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to remove excess primers and dNTPs before Sanger sequencing using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Kit and the ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). PCR fragment was sequenced and analyzed in both directions. The sequence was finally compared to the reference sequence of the BRAF gene (GenBank accession number: NG_007873).

Statistical analyses

The correlation between BRAF V600E mutation and age, sex, tumor location, and organ involvement was analyzed by the chisquare test. p<.05 was considered a significant difference. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

Characteristics of pediatric LCH

In 94 cases of LCH, the median age was 3.02 years (range, 0 to 12 years; minimum, 10 days old). LCH was most frequently found in the age group of under 3 (60.6%), in which 1-year-old patients were predominant (56.1%, 32/ 57 cases). LCH was more common in males than in females, with a male: female ratio of 1.4. Soft tissues were the most common biopsy location (n=39, 41.5%), followed by the skin (n=30, 31.9%), bones (n=18, 19.1%), lymph nodes (n=6, 6.4%) and lung (n=1, 1.1%). The clinicopathologic features are summarized in Table 1. Forty-eight patients (51.1%) had single system involved, while 46 patients (48.9%) had multiple systems involved. Risk organ involvement was observed in 35 patients (37.2%). The Langerhans cells were pathologically characterized by abundant pale cytoplasm and folded nuclei (Fig. 1) that expressed CD1a. The intensity of CD1a staining was also divided into low and high expression (33% vs. 67%).

BRAF mutation analysis

Sequencing analyses for all 94 patients successfully defined BRAF V600E status. BRAF V600E mutation exon 15 was found in 45 cases (47.9%) (Fig. 2). In Table 2, we demonstrate the relation between BRAF V600E mutation and clinical parameters. Multiple system LCH showed a significantly higher BRAF V600E mutation rate than the single system LCH (p=.001). There was no significant difference between BRAF status and other clinical characteristics such as age, sex, location, risk organs involvement, and CD1a expression.

DISCUSSION

BRAF mutations play the leading role in the oncogenesis of human cancers because of their involvement in the Ras-ERK signaling cascade, which regulates cellular motility, proliferation, and survival. Recent studies have found somatic mutations that trigger mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in most LCH patients [13,15–19]. In particular, the BRAF V600E mutation is found in more than 50% of LCH lesions in children, while other modifications of the codon V600 such as V600K, V600D, or V600R are not present in this disease [20]. The BRAF mutation presentation appears to be complicated; however, the most common point mutation is V600E (the valine codon in position 600, located in exon 15). Most BRAF mutations are detected in exons 11 and 15 by DNA-based sequencing assays [8]. In particular, more than 80% of all BRAF mutations are in exon 15, which results in changing valine for glutamic acid at codon 600 (V600E) [10]. Exon 11 mutations seem to be rare in LCH. Alayed et al. [21] detected BRAF mutations in LCH by pyrosequencing assays and found exon 15 BRAF V600E mutation and no exon 11 mutations in all cases.

This study found 47.9% of cases with BRAF mutations detected in exon 15 (BRAF V600E). Our data showed that the BRAF V600E mutation in Vietnamese pediatric LCH was relatively high but unrelated to sex, age, and risk organ involvement. In previous studies on Caucasian children, BRAF mutation frequency varied from 33% to 69% [12,13,16,19,22]. The study of Heritier et al. [12] on 315 pediatric LCH patients determined 173 cases (54.6%) with BRAF V600E mutation. They also showed a significant relationship between BRAF V600E mutation with age under 3 years old and multisystem disease, mostly when there was a risk of organ involvement. Badalian-Very et al. [23] also reported that the incidence of BRAF V600E mutation was 57% in 61 LCH patients, predominantly in patients with bone involvement. The mutation rate was also reportedly higher in young patients, especially children under age 15. Ozer et al. [24] showed that 70% of pediatric LCH patients younger than 2 years of age significantly harbored BRAF V600E mutation. However, the ratio of BRAF V600E status in pediatric LCH reported in some Asian populations was lower. Sasaki et al. [25]_ demonstrated 21% BRAF V600E mutations in Japanese patients (4/19 cases); Go et al. [26] showed 25% (7/28 cases) in South Korean patients. These studies showed a different BRAF V600E status across the various population, which raised a possible question of racial involvement on genetic profile.

Moreover, the BRAF V600E mutation status showed variable distribution in some specific organs. Liu et al. [27] showed that 50% of bone lesions in the head and neck (18/36 cases) were identified with BRAF V600E mutation. Other studies found the transformation in over 70% of skin cases [12,24], especially in multifocal skin involvement and multisystem disease. In the present study, the BRAF V600E mutation was detected mostly in LCH of the soft tissues (51.1%), followed by skin (28.9%), bone (15.5%), and lymph nodes (4.4%). In our study, 13/30 (43.3%) skin cases harbored BRAF V600E mutation, lower than Ozer et al. [24] (77.8%) and Heritier et al. [12] (77.0%). False-negative results may occur in small-sized tumors such as skin lesions due to an insufficient amount of tumor cells. In this study, 7/18 (38.9%) cases of LCH bone lesions harbored BRAF mutation; therefore, the current decalcifying solution possibly did little harm to DNA quality. Furthermore, no significant relation between BRAF V600E status and LCH location was observed in this study and others [12,24].

In 94 patients of this study, BRAF V600E mutation was significantly associated with multisystem involvement (p=0.001). Similarly, Heritier et al. [12] showed that BRAF V600E mutation correlated with high-risk LCH, including multiple systems and risk organ involvement, resulting in permanent, irreversible damage. Adding to these points, Heritier et al. [12] showed that patients with BRAF V600E more commonly displayed resistance to combined vinblastine corticosteroid therapy, higher reactivation rate, long-term consequences from disease or treatment. Ozer et al. [24] also found a statistical relationship between BRAF mutation and risk organ lesions. However, in this study, risk organ lesions showed no significant relation to BRAF status. The prevalence of LCH BRAF mutation and its association with increased risk condition such as multiple systems or risk organs involvement possibly suggests a targeted treatment using BRAF inhibitors for those that harbor the mutation.

In conclusion, the BRAF V600E status was detected with high frequency in Vietnamese pediatric LCH and may become a useful prognostic marker due to its association with multiple system LCH. The identification of aggressive LCH based on genetic alterations is required for disease management and BRAF inhibitors.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments

Fig. 1

Langerhans cell histiocytosis on hematoxylin and eosin staining: (A) skin lesion, (B) soft tissue of the head and neck, (C) bone lesion, and (D) lymph node lesion.

Fig. 2

The BRAF V600E status in pediatric Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

REFERENCES

• 1. Guyot-Goubin A, Donadieu J, Barkaoui M, Bellec S, Thomas C, Clavel J. Descriptive epidemiology of childhood Langerhans cell histiocytosis in France, 2000–2004. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008; 51: 71-5. ArticlePubMed
• 2. Salotti JA, Nanduri V, Pearce MS, Parker L, Lynn R, Windebank KP. Incidence and clinical features of Langerhans cell histiocytosis in the UK and Ireland. Arch Dis Child 2009; 94: 376-80. ArticlePubMed
• 3. Arceci RJ. The histiocytoses: the fall of the Tower of Babel. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35: 747-67. ArticlePubMed
• 4. Gadner H, Minkov M, Grois N, et al. Therapy prolongation improved outcome in multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood 2013; 121: 5006-14. ArticlePubMed
• 5. Abla O, Weitzman S. Treatment of Langerhans cell histiocytosis: role of BRAF/MAPK inhibition. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2015; 2015: 565-70. ArticlePubMed
• 6. Birbeck MS, Breathnach AS, Everall JD. An electron microscope study of basal melanocytes and high-level clear cells (Langerhans cell) in vitiligo. J Investig Dermatol 1961; 37: 51-64. Article
• 7. Minkov M. Multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis in children: current treatment and future directions. Paediatr Drugs 2011; 13: 75-86. ArticlePubMed
• 8. Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 2002; 417: 949-54. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 9. Fiskus W, Mitsiades N. B-Raf inhibition in the clinic: present and future. Annu Rev Med 2016; 67: 29-43. ArticlePubMed
• 10. Wooster R, Futreal AP, Stratton MR. Sequencing analysis of BRAF mutations in human cancers. Methods Enzymol 2006; 407: 218-24. ArticlePubMed
• 11. Ascierto PA, Kirkwood JM, Grob JJ, et al. The role of BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma. J Transl Med 2012; 10: 85.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 12. Heritier S, Emile JF, Barkaoui MA, et al. BRAF mutation correlates with high-risk Langerhans cell histiocytosis and increased resistance to first-line therapy. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 3023-30. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 13. Berres ML, Lim KP, Peters T, et al. BRAF-V600E expression in precursor versus differentiated dendritic cells defines clinically distinct LCH risk groups. J Exp Med 2015; 212: 281.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 14. Mehes G, Irsai G, Bedekovics J, et al. Activating BRAF V600E mutation in aggressive pediatric Langerhans cell histiocytosis: demonstration by allele-specific PCR/direct sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Am J Surg Pathol 2014; 38: 1644-8. ArticlePubMed
• 15. Brown NA, Furtado LV, Betz BL, et al. High prevalence of somatic MAP2K1 mutations in BRAF V600E-negative Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood 2014; 124: 1655-8. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 16. Haroche J, Charlotte F, Arnaud L, et al. High prevalence of BRAF V600E mutations in Erdheim-Chester disease but not in other non-Langerhans cell histiocytoses. Blood 2012; 120: 2700-3. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 17. Nelson DS, Quispel W, Badalian-Very G, et al. Somatic activating ARAF mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood 2014; 123: 3152-5. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 18. Sahm F, Capper D, Preusser M, et al. BRAFV600E mutant protein is expressed in cells of variable maturation in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood 2012; 120: e28-34. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 19. Satoh T, Smith A, Sarde A, et al. B-RAF mutant alleles associated with Langerhans cell histiocytosis, a granulomatous pediatric disease. PLoS One 2012; 7: e33891.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 20. Ballester LY, Cantu MD, Lim KP, et al. The use of BRAF V600E mutation-specific immunohistochemistry in pediatric Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Hematol Oncol 2018; 36: 307-15. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 21. Alayed K, Medeiros LJ, Patel KP, et al. BRAF and MAP2K1 mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis: a study of 50 cases. Hum Pathol 2016; 52: 61-7. ArticlePubMed
• 22. Roden AC, Hu X, Kip S, et al. BRAF V600E expression in Langerhans cell histiocytosis: clinical and immunohistochemical study on 25 pulmonary and 54 extrapulmonary cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2014; 38: 548-51. ArticlePubMed
• 23. Badalian-Very G, Vergilio JA, Degar BA, et al. Recurrent BRAF mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood 2010; 116: 1919-23. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 24. Ozer E, Sevinc A, Ince D, Yuzuguldu R, Olgun N. BRAF V600E mutation: a significant biomarker for prediction of disease relapse in pediatric Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2019; 22: 449-55. ArticlePubMed
• 25. Sasaki Y, Guo Y, Arakawa F, et al. Analysis of the BRAFV600E mutation in 19 cases of Langerhans cell histiocytosis in Japan. Hematol Oncol 2017; 35: 329-34. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 26. Go H, Jeon YK, Huh J, et al. Frequent detection of BRAF(V600E) mutations in histiocytic and dendritic cell neoplasms. Histopathology 2014; 65: 261-72. ArticlePubMed
• 27. Liu X, Zhang Y, Zhou CX. High prevalence of BRAF V600E mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis of head and neck in Chinese patients. Int J Surg Pathol 2019; 27: 836-43. ArticlePubMed

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Pathologic characteristics of histiocytic and dendritic cell neoplasms
  Sun Och Yoon
  Blood Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Sulfur dots/Au@Ag nanorods array-based polarized ECL sensor for the detection of thyroid cancer biomarker
  Zixuan Ding, Peilin Wang, Zhenrun Li, Yupeng Guo, Qiang Ma
  Talanta.2023; 265: 124925.     CrossRef