Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-04.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Clinicopathological Analysis of Growth Patterns of Malignant Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Tumors of the Pancreas: Unusual Growth Pattern of Fistulous Extension.
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Pathol Transl Med > Volume 41(1); 2007 > Article
Original Article Clinicopathological Analysis of Growth Patterns of Malignant Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Tumors of the Pancreas: Unusual Growth Pattern of Fistulous Extension.
Kee Taek Jang, Ghee Young Kwon, Geunghwan Ahn
Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine 2007;41(1):38-43
DOI: https://doi.org/
Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 135-710, Korea. kt12.jang@samsung.com
  • 1,500 Views
  • 13 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus

BACKGROUND
Usually, a malignant intraductal papillary mucinous tumor (IPMT) of the pancreas shows invasive carcinoma. Recently, IPMT with an unusual growth pattern of a fistulous extension was reported. However, little is known about malignant IPMTs with a different growth pattern of invasion and fistulous extension.
METHODS
Malignant IPMTs were classified into invasive (colloid or tubular type) carcinomas and the fistulous extension type according to their growth patterns. Their clinicopathological characteristics were compared.
RESULTS
Among a total of 68 cases of IPMT, there were 16 cases with malignant IPMT; eight, six and two of the colloid, tubular, and fistulous extension types, respectively. The immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of MUC1 was found in seven out of eight colloid and five out of six tubular types, but there was no IHC expression of MUC1 in the fistulous extension type. The IHC expression of MUC2 was noted in one of the eight colloid, one of the six tubular and in both cases with the fistulous extension type. There was no difference in the tumor recurrence rates bet- ween the different growth patterns.
CONCLUSIONS
IPMT with the fistulous extension type has a peculiar extension pattern consisting of multiple fistulous tracts without a mass. Although most of the epithelium in the fistulous tract show moderate to severe dysplasia, only the fistulous extension should be considered to be an unusual growth pattern of malignant IPMT. The clinical significance of this unusual type of IPMT remains to be determined.

Related articles

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine