Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-04.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Smooth Muscle Hyperplasia of the Epididymis: Report of A Case and Review of the Literature.
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Pathol Transl Med > Volume 43(2); 2009 > Article
Case Report Smooth Muscle Hyperplasia of the Epididymis: Report of A Case and Review of the Literature.
Hyun Soo Kim, Ji Youn Sung, Gou Young Kim, Sung Jig Lim, Hyun Cheol Kim, Hyung Lae Lee
Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine 2009;43(2):177-181
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2009.43.2.177
1Department of Pathology, East-West Neo Medical Center, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea. pathogen@medimail.co.kr
2Department of Radiology, East-West Neo Medical Center, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
3Department of Urology, East-West Neo Medical Center, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3,137 Views
  • 20 Download
  • 4 Crossref
  • 3 Scopus

A 66-year-old man underwent surgery to remove an incidentally discovered non-tender intrascrotal mass. Ultrasonography revealed an irregular-margined, heterogeneous mass-like lesion in the epididymal tail. The mass was relatively well circumscribed but unencapsulated, irregular and firm; it consisted of expansile, increased smooth muscle fascicles originating from the epididymal muscular coat. Its cellular growth pattern lacked the cohesive, well-circumscribed proliferation pattern typical of a leiomyoma. A diagnosis of smooth muscle hyperplasia of the epididymis was made. Although ultrasonography is the imaging modality of choice for evaluating suspected intrascrotal masses, there are times when it cannot reliably identify the character of the masses and distinguish malignant from benign lesions. Ill-defined, solid extratesticular masses, that are ultrasonographically ambiguous, should be excised and confirmed histopathologically and smooth muscle hyperplasia of the epididymis should be included in the differential diagnosis of solid extratesticular masses.


J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine