Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

Original Articles

Establishing molecular pathology curriculum for pathology trainees and continued medical education: a collaborative work from the Molecular Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists: Jiwon Koh, Ha Young Park, Jeong Mo Bae, Jun Kang, Uiju Cho, Seung Eun Lee, Haeyoun Kang, Min Eui Hong, Jae Kyung Won, Youn-La Choi, Wan-Seop Kim, Ahwon Lee; J Pathol Transl Med. 2023;57(5):265-272. Published online September 15, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2023.08.26

1,535 View
174 Download

Abstract PDF: Background
The importance of molecular pathology tests has increased during the last decade, and there is a great need for efficient training of molecular pathology for pathology trainees and as continued medical education.
Methods
The Molecular Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists appointed a task force composed of experienced molecular pathologists to develop a refined educational curriculum of molecular pathology. A 3-day online educational session was held based on the newly established structure of learning objectives; the audience were asked to score their understanding of 22 selected learning objectives before and after the session to assess the effect of structured education.
Results
The structured objectives and goals of molecular pathology was established and posted as a web-based interface which can serve as a knowledge bank of molecular pathology. A total of 201 pathologists participated in the educational session. For all 22 learning objectives, the scores of self-reported understanding increased after educational session by 9.9 points on average (range, 6.6 to 17.0). The most effectively improved items were objectives from next-generation sequencing (NGS) section: ‘NGS library preparation and quality control’ (score increased from 51.8 to 68.8), ‘NGS interpretation of variants and reference database’ (score increased from 54.1 to 68.0), and ‘whole genome, whole exome, and targeted gene sequencing’ (score increased from 58.2 to 71.2). Qualitative responses regarding the adequacy of refined educational curriculum were collected, where favorable comments dominated.
Conclusions
Approach toward the education of molecular pathology was refined, which would greatly benefit the future trainees.

Single-center study on clinicopathological and typical molecular pathologic features of metastatic brain tumor: Su Hwa Kim, Young Suk Lee, Sung Hak Lee, Yeoun Eun Sung, Ahwon Lee, Jun Kang, Jae-Sung Park, Sin Soo Jeun, Youn Soo Lee; J Pathol Transl Med. 2023;57(4):217-231. Published online July 11, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2023.06.10

1,180 View
113 Download

Abstract PDF: Background
The metastatic brain tumor is the most common brain tumor. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the clinicopathological and molecular pathologic features of brain metastases (BM).
Methods
A total of 269 patients were diagnosed with BM through surgical resection at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital from January 2010 to March 2020. We reviewed the clinicopathological features and molecular status of primary and metastatic brain tissues using immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology results.
Results
Among 269 patients, 139 males and 130 females were included. The median age of primary tumor was 58 years (range, 13 to 87 years) and 86 patients (32.0%) had BM at initial presentation. Median BM free interval was 28.0 months (range, 1 to 286 months). The most frequent primary site was lung 46.5% (125/269), and followed by breast 15.6% (42/269), colorectum 10.0% (27/269). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation was found in 50.8% (32/63) and 58.0% (40/69) of lung primary and BM, respectively. In both breast primary and breast cancer with BM, luminal B was the most frequent subtype at 37.9% (11/29) and 42.9% (18/42), respectively, followed by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 with 31.0% (9/29) and 33.3% (14/42). Triple-negative was 20.7% (6/29) and 16.7% (7/42), and luminal A was 10.3% (3/29) and 7.1% (3/42) of breast primary and BM, respectively. In colorectal primary and colorectal cancer with BM, KRAS mutation was found in 76.9% (10/13) and 66.7% (2/3), respectively.
Conclusions
We report the clinicopathological and molecular pathologic features of BM that can provide useful information for understanding the pathogenesis of metastasis and for clinical trials based on the tumor’s molecular pathology.

Reviews

A standardized pathology report for gastric cancer: 2nd edition: Young Soo Park, Myeong-Cherl Kook, Baek-hui Kim, Hye Seung Lee, Dong-Wook Kang, Mi-Jin Gu, Ok Ran Shin, Younghee Choi, Wonae Lee, Hyunki Kim, In Hye Song, Kyoung-Mee Kim, Hee Sung Kim, Guhyun Kang, Do Youn Park, So-Young Jin, Joon Mee Kim, Yoon Jung Choi, Hee Kyung Chang, Soomin Ahn, Mee Soo Chang, Song-Hee Han, Yoonjin Kwak, An Na Seo, Sung Hak Lee, Mee-Yon Cho; J Pathol Transl Med. 2023;57(1):1-27. Published online January 15, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2022.12.23

6,621 View
803 Download
4 Web of Science
6 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

The first edition of ‘A Standardized Pathology Report for Gastric Cancer’ was initiated by the Gastrointestinal Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists and published 17 years ago. Since then, significant advances have been made in the pathologic diagnosis, molecular genetics, and management of gastric cancer (GC). To reflect those changes, a committee for publishing a second edition of the report was formed within the Gastrointestinal Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists. This second edition consists of two parts: standard data elements and conditional data elements. The standard data elements contain the basic pathologic findings and items necessary to predict the prognosis of GC patients, and they are adequate for routine surgical pathology service. Other diagnostic and prognostic factors relevant to adjuvant therapy, including molecular biomarkers, are classified as conditional data elements to allow each pathologist to selectively choose items appropriate to the environment in their institution. We trust that the standardized pathology report will be helpful for GC diagnosis and facilitate large-scale multidisciplinary collaborative studies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Genomic and Transcriptomic Characterization of Gastric Cancer with Bone Metastasis
Sujin Oh, Soo Kyung Nam, Keun-Wook Lee, Hye Seung Lee, Yujun Park, Yoonjin Kwak, Kyu Sang Lee, Ji-Won Kim, Jin Won Kim, Minsu Kang, Young Suk Park, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Yun-Suhk Suh, Do Joong Park, Hyung Ho Kim
Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 56(1): 219. CrossRef
Microscopic tumor mapping of post-neoadjuvant therapy pancreatic cancer specimens to predict post-surgical recurrence: A prospective cohort study
Yeshong Park, Yeon Bi Han, Jinju Kim, MeeYoung Kang, Boram Lee, Eun Sung Ahn, Saemi Han, Haeryoung Kim, Hee-Young Na, Ho-Seong Han, Yoo-Seok Yoon
Pancreatology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Resectable Gastric Cancer: Analysis from a Western Academic Center
Elliott J. Yee, Danielle Gilbert, Jeffrey Kaplan, Sachin Wani, Sunnie S. Kim, Martin D. McCarter, Camille L. Stewart
Cancers.2024; 16(7): 1428. CrossRef
Pathological Interpretation of Gastric Tumors in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Jung Yeon Kim
Journal of Digestive Cancer Research.2023; 11(1): 15. CrossRef
Histopathology of Gastric Cancer
Baek-hui Kim, Sung Hak Lee
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2023; 23(2): 143. CrossRef
Endoscopic submucosal dissection hands-on training with artificial mucosal layer EndoGEL
Tae-Se Kim, Jun Haeng Lee
Journal of Innovative Medical Technology.2023; 1(1): 5. CrossRef

Good Laboratory Standards for Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing Cancer Panel Tests: Jihun Kim, Woong-Yang Park, Nayoung K. D. Kim, Se Jin Jang, Sung-Min Chun, Chang-Ohk Sung, Jene Choi, Young-Hyeh Ko, Yoon-La Choi, Hyo Sup Shim, Jae-Kyung Won; J Pathol Transl Med. 2017;51(3):191-204. Published online May 10, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2017.03.14

22,904 View
1,054 Download
30 Web of Science
31 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has recently emerged as an essential component of personalized cancer medicine due to its high throughput and low per-base cost. However, no sufficient guidelines for implementing NGS as a clinical molecular pathology test are established in Korea. To ensure clinical grade quality without inhibiting adoption of NGS, a taskforce team assembled by the Korean Society of Pathologists developed laboratory guidelines for NGS cancer panel testing procedures and requirements for clinical implementation of NGS. This consensus standard proposal consists of two parts: laboratory guidelines and requirements for clinical NGS laboratories. The laboratory guidelines part addressed several important issues across multistep NGS cancer panel tests including choice of gene panel and platform, sample handling, nucleic acid management, sample identity tracking, library preparation, sequencing, analysis and reporting. Requirements for clinical NGS tests were summarized in terms of documentation, validation, quality management, and other required written policies. Together with appropriate pathologist training and international laboratory standards, these laboratory standards would help molecular pathology laboratories to successfully implement NGS cancer panel tests in clinic. In this way, the oncology community would be able to help patients to benefit more from personalized cancer medicine.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Validation and Clinical Application of ONCOaccuPanel for Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing of Solid Tumors
Moonsik Kim, Changseon Lee, Juyeon Hong, Juhee Kim, Ji Yun Jeong, Nora Jee-Young Park, Ji-Eun Kim, Ji Young Park
Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(2): 429. CrossRef
Establishing molecular pathology curriculum for pathology trainees and continued medical education: a collaborative work from the Molecular Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists
Jiwon Koh, Ha Young Park, Jeong Mo Bae, Jun Kang, Uiju Cho, Seung Eun Lee, Haeyoun Kang, Min Eui Hong, Jae Kyung Won, Youn-La Choi, Wan-Seop Kim, Ahwon Lee
Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2023; 57(5): 265. CrossRef
Clinical applications of next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of genetic disorders in Korea: a narrative review
Jihoon G. Yoon, Man Jin Kim, Yong Jin Kwon, Jong-Hee Chae
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2023; 66(10): 613. CrossRef
Obtaining spatially resolved tumor purity maps using deep multiple instance learning in a pan-cancer study
Mustafa Umit Oner, Jianbin Chen, Egor Revkov, Anne James, Seow Ye Heng, Arife Neslihan Kaya, Jacob Josiah Santiago Alvarez, Angela Takano, Xin Min Cheng, Tony Kiat Hon Lim, Daniel Shao Weng Tan, Weiwei Zhai, Anders Jacobsen Skanderup, Wing-Kin Sung, Hwee
Patterns.2022; 3(2): 100399. CrossRef
Update on Molecular Diagnosis in Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma and Its Role in the Era of Personalized Medicine
Ka-Hei (Murphy) Sun, Yin-Ting (Heylie) Wong, Ka-Man (Carmen) Cheung, Carmen (Michelle) Yuen, Yun-Tat (Ted) Chan, Wing-Yan (Jennifer) Lai, Chun (David) Chao, Wing-Sum (Katie) Fan, Yuen-Kiu (Karen) Chow, Man-Fai Law, Ho-Chi (Tommy) Tam
Diagnostics.2022; 12(2): 409. CrossRef
Defining Novel DNA Virus-Tumor Associations and Genomic Correlates Using Prospective Clinical Tumor/Normal Matched Sequencing Data
Chad M. Vanderbilt, Anita S. Bowman, Sumit Middha, Kseniya Petrova-Drus, Yi-Wei Tang, Xin Chen, Youxiang Wang, Jason Chang, Natasha Rekhtman, Klaus J. Busam, Sounak Gupta, Meera Hameed, Maria E. Arcila, Marc Ladanyi, Michael F. Berger, Snjezana Dogan, Ahm
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics.2022; 24(5): 515. CrossRef
Performance Evaluation of Three DNA Sample Tracking Tools in a Whole Exome Sequencing Workflow
Gertjan Wils, Céline Helsmoortel, Pieter-Jan Volders, Inge Vereecke, Mauro Milazzo, Jo Vandesompele, Frauke Coppieters, Kim De Leeneer, Steve Lefever
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy.2022; 26(4): 411. CrossRef
Clinical Quality Considerations when Using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in Clinical Drug Development
Timothé Ménard, Alaina Barros, Christopher Ganter
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science.2021; 55(5): 1066. CrossRef
Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)–Based Quality Information Exchange for Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing Genomic Testing: Implementation Study
Donghyeong Seong, Sungwon Jung, Sungchul Bae, Jongsuk Chung, Dae-Soon Son, Byoung-Kee Yi
Journal of Medical Internet Research.2021; 23(4): e26261. CrossRef
Status of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Genetic Diagnosis in Hematologic Malignancies in Korea (2017-2018)
JinJu Kim, Ja Young Lee, Jungwon Huh, Myung-Hyun Nam, Myungshin Kim, Young-Uk Cho, Sun-Young Kong, Seung-Tae Lee, In-Suk Kim
Laboratory Medicine Online.2021; 11(1): 25. CrossRef
MSI-Testung
Josef Rüschoff, Gustavo Baretton, Hendrik Bläker, Wolfgang Dietmaier, Manfred Dietel, Arndt Hartmann, Lars-Christian Horn, Korinna Jöhrens, Thomas Kirchner, Ruth Knüchel, Doris Mayr, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus, Peter Schirmacher, Mark
Der Pathologe.2021; 42(4): 414. CrossRef
Molecular biomarker testing for non–small cell lung cancer: consensus statement of the Korean Cardiopulmonary Pathology Study Group
Sunhee Chang, Hyo Sup Shim, Tae Jung Kim, Yoon-La Choi, Wan Seop Kim, Dong Hoon Shin, Lucia Kim, Heae Surng Park, Geon Kook Lee, Chang Hun Lee
Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2021; 55(3): 181. CrossRef
MSI testing
Josef Rüschoff, Gustavo Baretton, Hendrik Bläker, Wolfgang Dietmaier, Manfred Dietel, Arndt Hartmann, Lars-Christian Horn, Korinna Jöhrens, Thomas Kirchner, Ruth Knüchel, Doris Mayr, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus, Peter Schirmacher, Mark
Der Pathologe.2021; 42(S1): 110. CrossRef
16S rDNA microbiome composition pattern analysis as a diagnostic biomarker for biliary tract cancer
Huisong Lee, Hyeon Kook Lee, Seog Ki Min, Won Hee Lee
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk Stratification Using a Novel Genetic Classifier IncludingPLEKHS1Promoter Mutations for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer with Distant Metastasis
Chan Kwon Jung, Seung-Hyun Jung, Sora Jeon, Young Mun Jeong, Yourha Kim, Sohee Lee, Ja-Seong Bae, Yeun-Jun Chung
Thyroid.2020; 30(11): 1589. CrossRef
Biomarker testing for advanced lung cancer by next-generation sequencing; a valid method to achieve a comprehensive glimpse at mutational landscape
Anurag Mehta, Smreti Vasudevan, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Manoj Panigrahi, Moushumi Suryavanshi, Mumtaz Saifi, Ullas Batra
Applied Cancer Research.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Application Areas of Traditional Molecular Genetic Methods and NGS in relation to Hereditary Urological Cancer Diagnosis
Dmitry S. Mikhaylenko, Alexander S. Tanas, Dmitry V. Zaletaev, Marina V. Nemtsova
Journal of Oncology.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef
Assembling and Validating Bioinformatic Pipelines for Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assays
Jeffrey A SoRelle, Megan Wachsmann, Brandi L. Cantarel
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.2020; 144(9): 1118. CrossRef
Standard operating procedure for somatic variant refinement of sequencing data with paired tumor and normal samples
Erica K. Barnell, Peter Ronning, Katie M. Campbell, Kilannin Krysiak, Benjamin J. Ainscough, Lana M. Sheta, Shahil P. Pema, Alina D. Schmidt, Megan Richters, Kelsy C. Cotto, Arpad M. Danos, Cody Ramirez, Zachary L. Skidmore, Nicholas C. Spies, Jasreet Hun
Genetics in Medicine.2019; 21(4): 972. CrossRef
A DNA pool of FLT3-ITD positive DNA samples can be used efficiently for analytical evaluation of NGS-based FLT3-ITD quantitation - Testing several different ITD sequences and rates, simultaneously
Zoltán A. Mezei, Dávid Tornai, Róza Földesi, László Madar, Andrea Sümegi, Mária Papp, Péter Antal-Szalmás
Journal of Biotechnology.2019; 303: 25. CrossRef
Pharmacogenomic Testing: Clinical Evidence and Implementation Challenges
Hippman, Nislow
Journal of Personalized Medicine.2019; 9(3): 40. CrossRef
Cancer Panel Assay for Precision Oncology Clinic: Results from a 1-Year Study
Dohee Kwon, Binnari Kim, Hyeong Chan Shin, Eun Ji Kim, Sang Yun Ha, Kee-Taek Jang, Seung Tae Kim, Jeeyun Lee, Won Ki Kang, Joon Oh Park, Kyoung-Mee Kim
Translational Oncology.2019; 12(11): 1488. CrossRef
Analytical Evaluation of an NGS Testing Method for Routine Molecular Diagnostics on Melanoma Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tumor-Derived DNA
Mancini, Simi, Salvianti, Castiglione, Sonnati, Pinzani
Diagnostics.2019; 9(3): 117. CrossRef
Benchmark Database for Process Optimization and Quality Control of Clinical Cancer Panel Sequencing
Donghyeong Seong, Jongsuk Chung, Ki-Wook Lee, Sook-Young Kim, Byung-Suk Kim, Jung-Keun Song, Sungwon Jung, Taeseob Lee, Donghyun Park, Byoung-Kee Yi, Woong-Yang Park, Dae-Soon Son
Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering.2019; 24(5): 793. CrossRef
Use of the Ion PGM and the GeneReader NGS Systems in Daily Routine Practice for Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients: A Practical Point of View Reporting a Comparative Study and Assessment of 90 Patients
Simon Heeke, Véronique Hofman, Elodie Long-Mira, Virginie Lespinet, Salomé Lalvée, Olivier Bordone, Camille Ribeyre, Virginie Tanga, Jonathan Benzaquen, Sylvie Leroy, Charlotte Cohen, Jérôme Mouroux, Charles Marquette, Marius Ilié, Paul Hofman
Cancers.2018; 10(4): 88. CrossRef
Use of the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel in clinical molecular pathology laboratories for analysis of solid tumours: With emphasis on validation with relevant single molecular pathology tests and the Oncomine Focus Assay
Ahwon Lee, Sung-Hak Lee, Chan Kwon Jung, Gyungsin Park, Kyo Young Lee, Hyun Joo Choi, Ki Ouk Min, Tae Jung Kim, Eun Jung Lee, Youn Soo Lee
Pathology - Research and Practice.2018; 214(5): 713. CrossRef
Recent Advancement of the Molecular Diagnosis in Pediatric Brain Tumor
Jeong-Mo Bae, Jae-Kyung Won, Sung-Hye Park
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2018; 61(3): 376. CrossRef
The long tail of molecular alterations in non-small cell lung cancer: a single-institution experience of next-generation sequencing in clinical molecular diagnostics
Caterina Fumagalli, Davide Vacirca, Alessandra Rappa, Antonio Passaro, Juliana Guarize, Paola Rafaniello Raviele, Filippo de Marinis, Lorenzo Spaggiari, Chiara Casadio, Giuseppe Viale, Massimo Barberis, Elena Guerini-Rocco
Journal of Clinical Pathology.2018; 71(9): 767. CrossRef
Clinical laboratory utilization management and improved healthcare performance
Christopher Naugler, Deirdre L. Church
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences.2018; 55(8): 535. CrossRef
Development of HLA-A, -B and -DR Typing Method Using Next-Generation Sequencing
Dong Hee Seo, Jeong Min Lee, Mi Ok Park, Hyun Ju Lee, Seo Yoon Moon, Mijin Oh, So Young Kim, Sang-Heon Lee, Ki-Eun Hyeong, Hae-Jin Hu, Dae-Yeon Cho
The Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion.2018; 29(3): 310. CrossRef
Value-based genomics
Jun Gong, Kathy Pan, Marwan Fakih, Sumanta Pal, Ravi Salgia
Oncotarget.2018; 9(21): 15792. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search