Meningeal Solitary Fibrous Tumors with Delayed Extracranial Metastasis

Article information

Abstract

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All cases of meningeal SFTs/HPCs between January 1995 and January 2013 were retrieved from the pathology archives at the Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH). We selected cases that matched the search term “solitary fibrous tumor” or “hemangiopericytoma,” and 48 cases of meningeal HPCs/SFTs were selected from this 18-year period. There was no sex predominance. The mean patient age was 48.1 years (range, 21 to 77 years). We selected 19 cases of pathologically and STAT6 immunohistochemically confirmed meningeal SFTs that were followed up for more than 11 years. Ten cases presented with systematic extracranial metastases (metastatic group), while nine had no extracranial metastases (non-metastatic group). The medical and pathological records of the19 cases are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary of the patients with and without meningeal SFT/HPC and extracranial metastasis, treated in Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH)

Two pathologists (N.H and S.-H.P) performed all of the pathological reviews. A Ventana autostainer was used for immunohistochemical staining, according to the manufacturer guidelines. Primary antibodies against STAT6 (1:1,000, clone Sc-621, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), CD34 (1:200, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA; Dako, 1:200), and MIB-1 (Ki-67) (Dako, 1:1,000) were used. A verified SFT or antibody-specific known positive control was used as a positive control. The primary antibodies were omitted in the negative control. For STAT6, robust nuclear positivity in >90% of the tumor cells was considered positive. For CD34, cytoplasmic staining in >10%, and for EMA, membranous staining in >10% of the tumor cells were considered positive. A nuclear algorithm of the Aperio ScanScope image analysis program (Aperio Technologies, Vista, CA, USA) was used to calculate the nuclear positivity in hot spots for the Ki-67 labeling index.

Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher exact tests. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare overall survival according to the patients’ age, tumor grade, mitoses, necrosis, Ki-67 labeling index, CD34 expression, and the occurrence of systemic metastasis. All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS ver. 22 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA).

The mean patient ages in the metastatic and non-metastatic groups were 37.1 years (range, 26.1 to 55.9 years) and 52.5 years (range, 34 to 76.2 years), respectively (Table 2). The mean follow-up periods for the metastatic and non-metastatic groups were 215 months (range, 124 to 351 months) and 99 months (range, 33 to 174 months), respectively. This study was designed to clarify the clinicopathological characteristics of metastatic and non-metastatic meningeal SFTs. In order to identify prognostic factors, several parameters were compared between the two groups, including Ki-67 labeling indices, mitotic rates, initial meningeal tumor size, and the presence or absence of necrosis.

Table 2.

The differences between the meningeal SFTs according to the presence or absence of systemic metastases

This study abides by the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki recommendations. It was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Hospital (IRB No. 1501-046-639).

RESULTS

Six of the ten patients in the metastatic group were women, and four were men. There was an average age of 37.1 years (range, 24 to 56 years). The initial symptoms included headache (6 patients), lower extremity weakness (2), double vision (1), and dizziness (1). In one patient, the diagnosis was an incidental finding. The disease originated in the supratentorial region in eight patients, and in the posterior fossa in the other two. There was no intracranial predilection site. Nine patients underwent gross total resections (GTR) of their tumors, while one (case 4) had a partial resection.

Radiologically, the tumors were large, well-enhanced, solid, and cystic masses attached to the dura. Typically, they had intratumoral vessels, and exhibited a severe mass effect. One patient (case 10) underwent preoperative radiotherapy (RT; 54 Gy) due to the tumor’s excessive size (6.5×5.8×5.5 cm) (Fig. 1A). The solid and cystic tumor decreased in size, as evidenced by a post-RT brain magnetic resonance imaging (Fig. 1B). Nine of the 10 patients in this group were treated with adjuvant therapies following GTR (Table 1). The types of adjuvant therapy included gamma knife surgery (GKS) in four patients, RT in three, Cyberknife RT in one, and chemotherapy in one.

Fig. 1.

Representative brain magnetic resonance images and histopathology of the primary brain tumor from case 10. (A) Prior to radiation therapy. A large, solid and cystic mass is observed in the right frontoparietal lobe with strong enhancement. There was severe mass effect. Intratumoral vessels were identified. (B) After preoperative radiation therapy. The tumor decreased in the size after radiation therapy. (C) The tumor demonstrates low cellular and edematous areas with staghorn-shaped vasculature. The tumor cells may have been ablated by radiotherapy. (D) Aberrant STAT6 nuclear positivity is observed in the primary brain tumor.

In the non-metastatic group, all patients underwent GTR. During the follow-up period, one patient received RT and two received RT+GKS (Table 1).

In the metastatic group, seven patients (70%) had extracranial metastases after local recurrence was detected. In the remaining three, the tumors metastasized without local recurrence. Common extracranial metastatic sites included the lungs (6 patients), bone (4), and liver (3). Other less frequent metastatic sites included the breast (1 patient), orbit (1), and external auditory canal (1). When the disease was metastatic to the bone, common sites included the vertebrae, femur, and ischium. When the tumor invaded the lungs and bone, multiple metastases were observed. In contrast, metastatic foci in the liver and breast were usually single masses (Fig. 2). However, lymph node enlargement or lymph node metastases were not present. The average time from the initial diagnosis of a meningeal tumor to systemic metastasis was 14.2 years (range, 5.6 to 24.2 years). The findings of these 10 cases with systemic metastasis are summarized in Table 1.

Fig. 2.

Computed tomography (CT) and pathology of a metastatic solitary fibrous tumor from case 10. (A) Liver CT scan showing a large, 12-cm soft tissue mass in the right lobe with prominent feeding vessels. (B) The cut surface of a hepatic tumor specimen showing a well-circumscribed, yellowish-tan-colored, solid tumor with multifocal necrosis, and hemorrhage with dilated vessels. (C) Microscopic examination of the liver mass reveals small, discohesive tumor cells with oval nuclei and fine chromatin. Staghorn-shaped hyalinized vessels and osteoclast-like multinucleated giant cells are identified. (D) Tumor cells are focally positive for CD34 on immunohistochemical staining. (E) Aberrant STAT6 nuclear positivity is observed in the metastatic tumor cells in the liver. (F) Ultrastructurally, the tumor is composed of sheets of oval to elongate cells around small capillaries. The tumor cells have nuclei with an oval or indented appearance, and fine, granular chromatin. Skein-like nuclei are also present. The individual tumor cells are surrounded by a thick, electron-dense, amorphous, external laminar material (arrowheads; uranyl acetate and lead citrate, × 5,000).

Histopathologically, the initial meningeal and metastatic tumors are identical to cellular SFTs (previously called intracranial HPC-like tumors of a cellular nature) (Figs. 1 and 2 are from the same patient, case 10). Interestingly, multinucleated osteoclasttype giant cells (OGCs) were widely present in one metastatic tumor to the liver (Fig. 2C). There was necrosis in 30% and 28% of tumors with and without systemic metastases, respectively. All of the tumors exhibited robust, but heterogeneous STAT6 immunopositivity. In most cases, the STAT6 immunostaining was stronger at the periphery of the tumor or in the perivascular areas (Figs. 1, 2). However, 40% of systemically metastatic tumors had positive CD34 immunostaining, while 85% of non-metastatic tumors showed at least focal CD34 positivity. EMA immunostaining was focally positive in two cases. The mean Ki-67 indices were 8.7% and 8.8% (1.0% to 27.3%) in the tumors of metastatic and non-metastatic groups, respectively. There were no differences in the Ki-67 labeling indices, mitoses, necrosis, or tumor size based on the presence or absence of systemic metastasis (Table 2).

Ultrastructural studies were carried out in three patients from the metastatic group and seven from the non-metastatic group. There were no differences between the two groups. Ultrastructural examination revealed sheets of oval to elongated cells around the small capillaries. The tumor nuclei were oval or indented in appearance. The nuclear chromatin was fine and granular, with skein-like nucleoli. The individual tumor cells were surrounded by thick, electron-dense external laminar material (Fig. 2F).

Over the 10–29-year (average, 17.2 years) follow-up period, five patients (50%) in the metastatic group died of their disease. The 10-year survival rate was 100%, but by 15 years, this rate dropped to 60%. In the non-metastatic group, the 10-year survival rate was 33%. This rate was sustained for 14.5 years of follow-up.

Paradoxically, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that patients with metastatic disease had significantly better overall survival times than did those without systemic metastases (p =.04) (Fig. 3). The mean survival of patients with systemic metastases was 215±79 months, and that of patients without systemic metastases was 99±47 months. The median survival time was 202 months and 99 months for patients with and without systemic metastases, respectively.

Fig. 3.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients with solitary fibrous tumors according to the presence or absence of systemic metastases. (A) Paradoxically, the patients with systemic metastases had better prognosis than did those without metastasis. Metastases usually arose approximately 10 years after the initial tumor development. Therefore, only longer survivors developed systemic metastases. (B) Younger patients lived longer and had better survival. The age cut-off to demonstrate a meaningful survival difference is 45 years. (C) Patients with an initial tumor size > 5 cm have poorer survival than did those with smaller tumors. (D) The age of tumor onset is significantly younger in patients with systemic metastases than it is in patients without metastases. The median ages of onset in patients with and without systemic metastases are 37.1 years and 52.5 years, respectively.

Both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that an age of onset >45 years and an initial tumor size >5 cm were significant markers of poor prognosis. There was no prognostic significance of increased mitoses (≥5/10 high-power fields), high Ki-67 index (≥5%), necrosis, high tumor grade, or the absence of CD34 expression on univariate and multivariate analyses. However, these factors did suggest a poor prognosis on multivariate analysis (Table 3).

Table 3.

The results of univariate and multivariate analysis

DISCUSSION

A SFT is an uncommon type of spindle-cell mesenchymal tumor. It is most commonly found in the visceral pleura, but also has been reported in virtually all extrapleural soft tissues [5,8]. Recently, SFTs and HPCs in soft tissue have been reclassified as a single entity [3]. Gengler and Guillou [9] introduced the concept of an SFT spectrum. They recommend that a conventional SFT is designated as a fibrous variant of an SFT, while a conventional HPC is considered a cellular variant of an SFT.

Regardless of where they develop in the CNS, there is morphological, immunohistochemical, and genetic overlap between SFTs and HPCs [10]. However, in the CNS, HPCs are still considered separate entities from SFTs [11]. The so-called meningeal SFTs have generally been regarded as indolent, non-aggressive tumors [3,12]. Conversely, meningeal HPCs have a high tendency to recur and to metastasize outside of the CNS; therefore, these are classified as World Health Organization grade II or III lesions [12]. Histopathologically, meningeal HPCs tend to have higher rates of mitosis and a higher Ki-67 index than do HPCs/SFTs in soft tissues. They also stain less intensely for CD34 and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) proteins [11]. However, two previous studies reported that several cases of SFTs progressed to HPCs at recurrence [3,10]. There have also been reports of extracranial metastases of conventional SFTs [13].

In the English-language literature, we identified 19 reports of meningeal SFTs/HPCs with extracranial metastasis (Table 4) [14-18]. The median age of tumor onset of these cases was 37 years, and there was no sex dominance (male:female=9:10). The median time between the initial tumor development and extracranial metastasis was 14.2 years (range, 5.6 to 24.2 years).

Table 4.

Summary of the patients with meningeal SFT/HPC with extracranial metastasis in the literature

In our series, patients with metastatic meningeal SFTs were a mean of 15 years younger than were those in the non-metastatic group. There was a female sex predominance (male:female= 2:3). Similar to the prior report, the mean time between the initial tumor development and extracranial metastasis was 14.2 years in our study [19]. Hoshi et al. [19] reported that two cases had metastasized to the bone, 17 and 19 years after resection of primary leptomeningeal HPCs and introduced that median time from primary tumor to the occurrence of systemic metastases was 149 years from literature review. The most common metastatic sites were the lungs, bone, and liver, but rarely, the breast, orbit, and external auditory canal were the metastatic site. There were no lymph node metastases. Therefore, the meningeal SFTs studied here present with very similar clinical features to those previously reported.

Two recent studies found that the NAB2-STAT6 gene fusion was a distinct molecular feature of SFTs and HPCs, in both meningeal and extracranial tumors [4,20]. Schweizer et al. [21] also found that nuclei stained positive for anti-STAT6 in 35 of 37 meningeal HPCs and in all 25 meningeal SFTs, but not in 87 meningiomas. This provided additional evidence in support of unifying the terms SFT and HPC. Robinson et al. [20] noted that overexpression of the fusion protein NAB2-STAT6 induces the proliferation of cultured cells and activates early growth response genes. These findings suggest that the NAB2-STAT6 fusion is a driver mutation of SFT [20].

In this study, strong aberrant nuclear expression of STAT6 was detected in all meningeal and extracranial metastatic SFTs (including the cases previously diagnosed as HPCs). This suggests that these tumors had the same pathogenesis. Verifying nuclear STAT6 immunoexpression or NAB2-STAT6 gene fusion may be useful to confirm the diagnosis, especially when only small biopsies are available for pathology, or in cases that are CD34-negative. Although CD34 is a good marker of SFTs/HPC, its sensitivity is <100%. Overall, there is 95% CD34 positivity in SFTs [22]. However, the CD34 positivity is lower in meningeal SFTs, as mentioned above [11].

To our knowledge, this is the first report of prominent OGCs described in an SFT/HPC (case 9). Previously, OGCs have been reported in various malignancies including breast, pancreatic, and gastric carcinomas [23-25], gastrointestinal stromal tumors [26], clear cell sarcoma-like tumors [27], squamous cell carcinoma of the skin [28], and malignant melanoma [29]. It is thought that OGCs result from a host reaction to degeneration and necrosis of the tumor. However, it is not well understood why OGCs are so exaggerated in non-histiocytic tumors.

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that patients with metastatic disease had significantly better survival than did those without systemic metastasis (p=.04) (Fig. 3). The mean age of the metastatic group was younger than that of the non-metastatic group (37.1 years vs 52.5 years, respectively), suggesting that the age might be the most important prognostic factor (Fig. 3). Younger patients lived longer, but also had a higher risk of metastasis than did older patients. The Ki-67 labeling index (≥5%), presence of necrosis, and absence of CD34 expression were not significant prognostic factors on univariate and multivariate analyses. The statistical insignificance of these latter factors may reflect the small number of cases involved.

In this study, two patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, one patient received a single cycle of VIP (VP-16, ifosfamide, cisplatin) chemotherapy and one received a single cycle of ifosfamide. There is no optimal chemotherapy regimen that has been established for SFTs/HPCs to date.30 There are limited case reports describing chemotherapy use. One case report described a patient with meningeal SFTs/HPCs who received two cycles of ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide) chemotherapy and lived at least 151 months [6]. Another study reported the relative success of various chemoregimens in 15 patients [31]. In that study, only two patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, but the treatment was stopped after one cycle in one patient due to a severe adverse effect.

In conclusion, we have reported 10 cases of meningeal SFTs with delayed extracranial metastasis. Systemic metastases developed after a long latent period, a mean of 14.2 years after the initial surgery. Metastases were associated with younger patient age and longer survival. Leptomeningeal SFTs can be divided into two groups by prognosis. The poor prognostic group is characterized by an initially locally aggressive tumor and early death. The better prognostic group is characterized by younger age of tumor onset, successful control of local recurrence, and a life expectancy >10 years. However, despite intensive treatment, this group eventually developed delayed systemic metastases. The median survival rates of patients with and without systemic metastases were 202 months and 99 months, respectively. The age of onset was the most important prognostic factor. The best prognostic group was <45 years old on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Therefore, meningeal SFTs arising in young patients (<45 years) require careful surveillance for the early detection of systemic metastases, especially because extracranial metastases usually occur after a latency period of >10 years.

Article information Continued