Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

Original Article

Comparison of Analytical and Clinical Performance of HPV 9G DNA Chip, PANArray HPV Genotyping Chip, and Hybrid-Capture II Assay in Cervicovaginal Swabs: Ho Young Jung, Hye Seung Han, Hyo Bin Kim, Seo Young Oh, Sun-Joo Lee, Wook Youn Kim; J Pathol Transl Med. 2016;50(2):138-146. Published online January 13, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2015.10.21

7,975 View
67 Download
4 Web of Science
3 Crossref

Background
Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection can be detected by using several molecular methods, including Hybrid-Capture II (HC2) assay and variable HPV DNA chip tests, although each method has different sensitivities and specificities. Methods: We performed HPV 9G DNA Chip (9G) and PANArray HPV Genotyping Chip (PANArray) tests on 118 cervicovaginal swabs and compared the results with HC2, cytology, histology, and direct sequencing results. Results: The overall and high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) positivity rates were 62.7% and 44.9% using 9G, and 61.0% and 30.5% using PANArray, respectively. The positivity rates for HR-HPV with these two chips were significantly lower than 55.1% when HC2 was used. The sensitivity of overall HPV positivity in detecting histologically confirmed low-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions or higher was 88.7% for all three tests. The specificity was 58.5% for 9G and 61.5% for PANArray, which was significantly lower than the 72.3% for HC2. With the HR-HPV⁺ genotype threshold, the sensitivity decreased to 75.5% for 9G and 52.8% for PANArray, which was significantly lower than the 88.7% for HC2. Comparison of the two chips showed concordant results in 55.1% of the samples, compatible results in 16.9%, and discordant results in 28.0%, exhibiting poor agreement in detecting certain HPV genotypes. Compared with direct sequencing, 9G yielded no discordant results, whereas PANArray yielded 31 discordant results (26.7%). Conclusions: Compared with HC2, the HPV genotyping tests showed lower sensitivity in histologic correlation. When the two chips were compared, the 9G was more sensitive and accurate for detecting HR-HPV than the PANArray.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Concordance of Anyplex™ II HPV HR assays with reference HPV assays in cervical cancer screening: Systematic review
Habtamu Biazin
Journal of Virological Methods.2022; 301: 114435. CrossRef
The clinical performance of human papillomavirus genotyping using PANArray HPV chip: Comparison to ThinPrep cytology alone and co-testing
Jiyoung Kim, Sun-Young Jun, Lee-So Maeng
Pathology - Research and Practice.2020; 216(9): 153121. CrossRef
Analytic performance of PANArray HPV and HPV 9G DNA chip tests for genotyping of high-risk human papillomavirus in cervical ThinPrep PreservCyt samples
Jiyoung Kim, Sun-Young Jun, Magdalena Grce
PLOS ONE.2019; 14(10): e0224483. CrossRef

Case Study

A Case of Multifocal Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Consisting of One Encapsulated Follicular Variant with BRAF K601E Mutation and Three Conventional Types with BRAF V600E Mutation: Wook Youn Kim, Young Sin Ko, Tae Sook Hwang, Hye Seung Han, So Dug Lim, Wan Seop Kim, Seo Young Oh; Korean J Pathol. 2013;47(3):293-298. Published online June 25, 2013; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.3.293

8,202 View
48 Download
7 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Multifocal papillary thyroid carcinoma (mPTC) comprises about 20-30% of PTC. In mPTC, individual tumor foci can be identical or frequently composed of different histological types including follicular, solid, tall-cell or conventional patterns. We report a case of mPTC consisting of one encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) and three conventional PTCs in a 44-year-old woman. This case genetically demonstrates unique features including the simultaneous presence of the BRAF V600E (T1799A) mutation and the BRAF K601E (A1801G) mutation in conventional PTC and FVPTC, respectively.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

BRAF K601E Mutation in Oncocytic Carcinoma of the Thyroid: A Case Report and Literature Review
Antonio Matrone, Fabrizia Citro, Carla Gambale, Alessandro Prete, Elisa Minaldi, Raffaele Ciampi, Teresa Ramone, Gabriele Materazzi, Liborio Torregrossa, Rossella Elisei
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(22): 6970. CrossRef
Case of aggressive metastatic follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma with BRAF K601E and BCORL1 mutations
Doaa Attia, Alexander Lurie, Qihui Zhai, Thomas Mesko, Robert Smallridge
BMJ Case Reports.2020; 13(6): e234208. CrossRef
BRAF gene: From human cancers to developmental syndromes
Muhammad Ramzan Manwar Hussain, Mukhtiar Baig, Hussein Sheik Ali Mohamoud, Zaheer Ulhaq, Daniel C. Hoessli, Ghaidaa Siraj Khogeer, Ranem Radwan Al-Sayed, Jumana Yousuf Al-Aama
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences.2015; 22(4): 359. CrossRef
Clinical significance of BRAF V600E mutation in 154 patients with thyroid nodules
LINGYING YU, LIZHEN MA, QIAOFENG TU, YI ZHANG, YUEMING CHEN, DAOJUN YU, SHAOYU YANG
Oncology Letters.2015; 9(6): 2633. CrossRef
Clinicopathological Features of Rare BRAF Mutations in Korean Thyroid Cancer Patients
Uiju Cho, Woo Jin Oh, Ja Seong Bae, Sohee Lee, Young Sub Lee, Gyeong Sin Park, Youn Soo Lee, Chan Kwon Jung
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2014; 29(8): 1054. CrossRef
Recurrent Thyroid Papillary Carcinoma in Children Under Ten Years Old: Report of Two Cases and Literature Review
Byeong-Joo Noh, Ji-Youn Sung, Youn-Wha Kim, Yong-Koo Park
Korean Journal of Pathology.2014; 48(4): 297. CrossRef
Anaplastic Transformation of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in a Young Man: A Case Study with Immunohistochemical andBRAFAnalysis
Ji Hye Park, Hyeong Ju Kwon, Cheong Soo Park, SoonWon Hong
Korean Journal of Pathology.2014; 48(3): 234. CrossRef

Original Article

Clinical Usefulness of SurePath(TM) Liquid-based Cytology in Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration: Comparison with the Conventional Smear in Diagnostic Efficacy and Applicability of BRAF Mutation Test.: Wook Youn Kim, Sang Hwa Lee, Young Sin Ko, So Dug Lim, Wan Seop Kim, Hye Seung Han, Hye Sil Seol, Seo Young Oh, Won Jin Moon, Tae Sook Hwang; Korean J Pathol. 2011;45(2):188-195.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2011.45.2.188

4,623 View
77 Download
8 Crossref

Abstract PDF

BACKGROUND
Recently, liquid-based cytology (LBC) has been introduced as an alternative to the conventional smear (CS) technique in thyroid fine needle aspiration, due to its diagnostic convenience.
METHODS
We assessed 77 cases of thyroid fine needle aspiration using the SurePath(TM) method (SP) as LBC and CS via split-sample techniques. BRAF mutation tests were carried out via polymerase chain reaction and pyrosequencing immediately after diagnosis or a delay of more than one year.
RESULTS
In a comparison between SP and CS, the rate of concordance between SP and CS was as high as 84.4% (kappa value, 0.754). In comparison with histologic diagnosis, the overall sensitivity was 100% for both. The specificity was 62.5% for SP and 56.3% for CS. Relative to CS, papillary carcinomas on SP slides revealed more accentuated nuclear irregularities, nucleoli, and reduced nuclear size. In contrast to CS, the delayed BRAFV600E mutation test using SP slides after 1-2 years failed. The use of new primers amplifying shorter product size could help the delayed test achieve success.
CONCLUSIONS
Differences in the diagnostic efficacy of SP and CS were negligible. The failure of the delayed BRAF mutation test on the SP slides might be associated with DNA degradation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Comparison of Liquid-Based Preparations with Conventional Smears in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspirates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Yun Jin Kang, Hyeon Woo Lee, Gulnaz Stybayeva, Se Hwan Hwang
Cancers.2024; 16(4): 751. CrossRef
Liquid‐based cytology of pigmented phaeohyphomycotic lesion of the palm masquerading as a metastatic tumor
Thara Keloth, Debasis Gochhait, S Sivaranjani, Neelaiah Siddaraju
Diagnostic Cytopathology.2019; 47(8): 828. CrossRef
DNA degradation in liquid‐based cytology and its comparison with conventional smear
Wook Youn Kim, Seo Young Oh, Hyunkyung Kim, Tae Sook Hwang
Diagnostic Cytopathology.2016; 44(5): 450. CrossRef
Comparison of EASYPREP® and SurePath® in thyroid fine‐needle aspiration
Yosep Chong, Ki Hyun Baek, Jee Young Kim, Tae‐Jung Kim, Eun Jung Lee, Chang Suk Kang
Diagnostic Cytopathology.2016; 44(4): 283. CrossRef
Conventional smears versus liquid-based preparations for thyroid fine-needle aspirates: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Neeraja Nagarajan, Alireza Najafian, Eric B. Schneider, Martha A. Zeiger, Matthew T. Olson
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology.2015; 4(5): 253. CrossRef
Liquid‐based cytology improves preoperative diagnostic accuracy of the tall cell variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma
Sung Hak Lee, Chan Kwon Jung, Ja Seong Bae, So Lyung Jung, Yeong Jin Choi, Chang Suk Kang
Diagnostic Cytopathology.2014; 42(1): 11. CrossRef
Stability of DNA, RNA, cytomorphology, and immunoantigenicity in Residual ThinPrep® Specimens
Younghye Kim, Kap Ro Choi, Moon Jung Chae, Bong Kyung Shin, Han Kyeom Kim, Aeree Kim, Baek‐hui Kim
APMIS.2013; 121(11): 1064. CrossRef
The Development of the Liquid Cell Smear Device for Liquid-Based Cytology Test
Han Yeong Oh, Ha Ju So, Seong Hyun Kim, Dong Wook Kim, Hyun Chang Kim
Applied Mechanics and Materials.2013; 284-287: 1564. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search