Background Before publication of the new classification system named the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) in 2018, there was no standard classification for salivary gland lesions obtained by fine-needle aspiration (FNA). We therefore aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of this system by retrospectively reviewing FNA samples using the MSRSGC and to determine their risk of developing into neoplasms and becoming malignant.
Methods Retrospective slide review and classification of salivary gland FNAs obtained over a 6-year period (2013–2018) at a single center were performed by two pathologists. The risks of neoplasm and malignancy for each category also were calculated.
Results This study surveyed 374 FNAs (371 patients) performed over a six-year period and selected 148 cases that included documented surgical follow-up (39.6%). Among the surgically treated cases, the distributions of FNA categories were as follows: non-diagnostic (ND; 16.9%), non-neoplastic (NN; 2.7%), atypia of undetermined significance (AUS; 3.4%), benign (BN; 54.7%), salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP; 10.1%), suspicious for malignancy (SM; 6.8%), and malignant (M; 5.4%). The risk of malignancy (ROM) was 24.0% for ND, 0% for NN, 40.0% for AUS, 2.5% for BN, 46.7% for SUMP, 100% for SM, and 87.5% for M. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 95.9% (142/148 cases).
Conclusions The newly proposed MSRSGC appears to be a reliable system for classification of salivary gland lesions according to the associated ROM.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Salivary gland fine-needle aspiration biopsy: quality assurance results from a tertiary cancer center Fanni Ratzon, Dominique L. Feliciano, Nora Katabi, Bin Xu, Oscar Lin, Xiao-Jun Wei Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology.2023; 12(3): 206. CrossRef
Cytohistological correlation and risk stratification of salivary gland lesions using the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: A tertiary care centre experience Tarun Kumar, Prerna Tewari, Jitendra Singh Nigam, Shreekant Bharti, Surabhi, Ruchi Sinha, Punam Prasad Bhadani Cytopathology.2023; 34(3): 225. CrossRef
Assessment of Risk of Malignancy of Fine-needle Aspiration Cytology in Salivary Gland Lesions Using the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology Categorization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Amit Kumar, Subhash Chandra, Bishnupati Singh, Swati Sharma, Ankita Tandon, Ajoy Kumar Shahi The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice.2023; 23(10): 1039. CrossRef
Milan Sınıflandırma Sistemi’ne Göre Değerlendirilen Tükürük Bezi İnce İğne Aspirasyon Sitolojilerinin Histopatolojik Tanı Uyumu Özlem SARAYDAROĞLU, Selin YİRMİBEŞ Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi.2023; 49(3): 285. CrossRef
Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology: Adoption and outcomes in a community setting Samih J. Nassif, Ali R. Sasani, Garrey T. Faller, Jennifer L. Harb, Jagdish K. Dhingra Head & Neck.2022; 44(6): 1462. CrossRef
Nondiagnostic salivary gland FNAs are associated with decreased risk of malignancy compared with “all‐comer” patients: Analysis of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology with a focus on Milan I: Nondiagnostic Shu K. Lui, Troy Tenney, Patrick C. Mullane, Kartik Viswanathan, Daniel J. Lubin Cancer Cytopathology.2022; 130(10): 800. CrossRef
Application of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Zhaoyang Wang, Huan Zhao, Huiqin Guo, Changming An Cancer Cytopathology.2022; 130(11): 849. CrossRef
Multiplexed single‐cell analysis of FNA allows accurate diagnosis of salivary gland tumors Juhyun Oh, Tae Yeon Yoo, Talia M. Saal, Lisa Tsay, William C. Faquin, Jonathan C.T. Carlson, Daniel G. Deschler, Sara I. Pai, Ralph Weissleder Cancer Cytopathology.2022; 130(8): 581. CrossRef
Cytologic analysis of vitreous fluids: A retrospective review of our 24 years of experience Gabriel L. Collins, Elizabeth W. Hubbard, Christopher T. Clark, Lisa D. Duncan, Laurentia Nodit Diagnostic Cytopathology.2021; 49(10): 1122. CrossRef