E-submission
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
- A Different Perspective on Macroscopic Sampling of Cholecystectomy Specimens
- Asuman Argon, Ayşe Yağcı, Funda Taşlı, Tulu Kebat, Senem Deniz, Nazif Erkan, Gül Kitapçıoğlu, Enver Vardar
- Korean J Pathol. 2013;47(6):519-525. Published online December 24, 2013
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.6.519
- 7,369 View
- 64 Download
- 7 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF Background Because there may be interdepartmental differences in macroscopic sampling of cholecystectomy specimens, we aimed to investigate differences between the longitudinal sampling technique and our classical sampling technique in cholecystectomy specimens in which there was no obvious malignancy.
Methods Six hundred eight cholecystectomy specimens that were collected between 2011 and 2012 were included in this study. The first group included 273 specimens for which one sample was taken from each of the fundus, body, and neck regions (our classical technique). The second group included 335 specimens for which samples taken from the neck region and lengthwise from the fundus toward the neck were placed together in one cassette (longitudinal sampling). The Pearson chi-square, Fisher exact, and ANOVA tests were used and differences were considered significant at p<.05.
Results In the statistical analysis, although gallbladders in the first group were bigger, the average length of the samples taken in the second group was greater. Inflammatory cells, pyloric metaplasia, intestinal metaplasia, low grade dysplasia, and invasive carcinoma were seen more often in the second group.
Conclusions In our study, the use of a longitudinal sampling technique enabled us to examine a longer mucosa and to detect more mucosal lesions than did our classical technique. Thus, longitudinal sampling can be an effective technique in detecting preinvasive lesions.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Cholecystectomy in children: indications, clinical, laboratory and histopathological findings and cost analysis
Aysel Ünlüsoy Aksu, Nebiyye Genel, Gülseren Şahin, Ferda Özbay Hoşnut, Ayşegül Tok, Ayşe Karaman
The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics.2024; 66(4): 473. CrossRef - Ultrasonographic features of gallbladder wall thickening in dogs with hypoalbuminemia
Masahiro Murakami, Hock Gan Heng, Sarah Steinbach, Mario Sola
Veterinary Quarterly.2023; 43(1): 1. CrossRef - Can the sampling method affect the detection of incidental gallbladder carcinoma? Comparative analysis of two sampling methods
Ezgi Hacihasanoglu, Esra Pasaoglu, Merve Cin, Enver Yarikkaya, Nevra Dursun, Sevim Baykal Koca
Annals of Diagnostic Pathology.2023; 67: 152187. CrossRef - Current management of incidental gallbladder cancer: A review
Claudio F. Feo, Giorgio C. Ginesu, Alessandro Fancellu, Teresa Perra, Chiara Ninniri, Giulia Deiana, Antonio M. Scanu, Alberto Porcu
International Journal of Surgery.2022; 98: 106234. CrossRef - Accuracy of Right Upper Quadrant Ultrasound in Estimating Gallbladder Wall Thickness
Lindsay Cefalu, Robert McMurray, Grant Sizemore, Gerald Bieniek, Michael Lustik, Christopher Yheulon
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2019; 29(1): 26. CrossRef - Optimal block sampling of routine, non‐tumorous gallbladders
Newton A C S Wong
Histopathology.2017; 71(1): 162. CrossRef - The Relationship Between Intracholecystic Papillary-Tubular Neoplasms and Invasive Carcinoma of the Gallbladder
Asuman Argon, Funda Yılmaz Barbet, Deniz Nart
International Journal of Surgical Pathology.2016; 24(6): 504. CrossRef
- Cholecystectomy in children: indications, clinical, laboratory and histopathological findings and cost analysis
First
Prev
