Fig. 1Immunostaining pattern for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) reveals weaker membranocytoplasmic immunoreactivity in normal cervical squamous epithelium (A) than in invasive carcinoma cells (B) which overexpress EGFR protein in both distinctly membranous and vaguely cytoplasmic patterns.
Fig. 2Snail-1 immunoexpression in normal (A) and neoplastic (B) squamous epithelium reveals the overtly upregulated Snail-1 protein in the invasive carcinoma compared to the normal epithelium.
Fig. 3Comparison of E-cadherin immunostaining pattern between normal, carcinoma in situ (CIS), and invasive squamous carcinoma (ISC) groups shows a strong membranous pattern in normal (A) and CIS (B), but a markedly reduced immunostaining in the ISC (C).
Fig. 4Acquisition of the mesenchymal cell nature is immunohistochemically demonstrated by immunostaining for vimentin, a mesenchymal cell marker, not in the normal squamous epithelium (A) but in the microinvasive squamous carcinoma (B). EP, epithelium; ST, stroma; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.
Fig. 5A chart comparing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression between carcinoma in situ (CIS), microinvasive, and invasive squamous carcinomas reveals no significant difference among them (p>0.05). Numbers in bars, numbers of the immunostained cases; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.
Fig. 6Comparison of E-cadherin expression patterns between carcinoma in situ (CIS), microinvasive, and invasive squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) reveals a marked difference in E-cadherin expression of strong or membranous pattern which is significantly reduced in the invasive carcinoma group (p<0.05).
Fig. 7E-cadherin expression pattern analyzed by either membranous or cytoplasmic staining reveals significantly increased cytoplasmic immunoreactivity or loss of membranous immunoreactivity in the invasive squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) compared to the carcinoma in situ (CIS) group (p<0.05).
Fig. 8Comparison of vimentin expression between three groups shows a much higher vimentin expression in microinvasive and invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cases than in carcinoma in situ (CIS) group (p<0.001).
Table 1Correlation between EGFR and Snail-1 immunoexpressions in the carcinoma in situ group
Table 2Interrelationship between E-cadherin and Snail-1 in 38 cases of microinvasive and invasive squamous carcinomas
Table 3Interrelationship between Snail-1 and vimentin in 38 cases of microinvasive and invasive squamous carcinomas
Table 4Inverse correlation between E-cadherin and vimentin expressions in overall cervix carcinomas, including carcinoma in situ (CIS), microinvasive, and invasive squamous carcinomas