MATERIALS AND METHODS

Design and data collection

A questionnaire designed by the Endocrine Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists to gather data concerning the extent of implementation of TBSRTC and its impact on clinical practice was mailed to 211 pathology laboratories in the year 2012. Participants were asked questions related to the year of implementation of TBSRTC, number of thyroid aspiration cases in 2010 and 2011, usage of liquid-based cytology, types of liquid-based cytology used, and usage of core needle biopsy. Subsequently, a questionnaire was mailed to 41 institutions that had agreed to provide the statistics of thyroid FNA including the incidence, operation rate and malignancy rate of each diagnostic categories of TBSRTC. All the participants’ answers were collated. Among them, sixteen institutes reported the incidence of each category (unsatisfactory, benign, AUS, follicular neoplasm [FN], suspicious for malignancy [SM], and malignancy) in TBSRTC diagnosed from January to December, 2011. In total, 42,132 cases were analyzed. Follow-up malignancy rates of each category in 15 institutes were also collected and analyzed. Malignancy rate of each category was estimated based on surgically resected specimens. This survey was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, waiving the requirement for informed consent (IRB No. B-1212/182-304).

Statistics

The statistical significance of the data was assessed using SPSS ver. 21.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated in two different settings considering thyroid FNA as a “screening test.” First, we calculated these parameters in malignant thyroid tumors. Surgical specimens which had been cytologically classified in the DC II of TBSRTC and diagnosed histologically as benign were considered to be true-negative samples. Surgical specimens whose cytologic diagnoses were in the remaining diagnostic categories (DC V, DC VI) and histologically proved to be malignant neoplasms were considered to be true-positives. The false-positive category included cases that had been diagnosed as SM or malignant (DC V, DC VI), but later confirmed histologically as benign (normal, non-neoplastic benign lesion, or benign neoplasm). The false-negative cases included those diagnosed as benign on FNA but confirmed as malignant upon surgical excision. In addition, those parameters were calculated for thyroid neoplasms including benign (such as follicular adenoma) and malignant. For this calculation, follow-up surgical specimens diagnosed as non-neoplastic benign disease or normal, which were interpreted as the DC II of TBSRTC, were considered to be true-negative samples, and the remaining diagnostic categories (DC IV, DC V, and DC VI), which proved to be either benign or malignant neoplasms by histologic examination of the surgical specimens, were considered to be true-positive. The false-positive category included cases that were diagnosed as FN, SM, and malignant but later confirmed histologically as benign non-neoplastic or normal. The false-negative cases included those diagnosed as DC II on FNA but confirmed as a true neoplasm upon surgical excision. The DC I and DC III (AUS/FLUS) categories were excluded from the statistical analysis because these diagnoses usually led to a repeat FNA rather than to surgical excision; moreover, these cases could not be categorized as either positive or negative.

RESULTS

General survey questions

Questionnaire surveys were sent out to 77 institutes of pathology with controlled quality authorized by the Korean Cytopathology Conference. Three institutes were excluded because they were sending out their cytology specimens to consultants for the diagnosis, and answers from 74 institutes were included in the assessment. The survey results are summarized in Table 1.

Among the 74 institutes, 60 used TBSRTC for their diagnostic categorization of thyroid FNA at the time of survey. The starting year of using this classification varied from 2008 to 2012. The usage increased particularly from 2010 to 2012, 3 to 5 years after the conference in Bethesda. In Korea, the corresponding guidelines of the KTA for management of patients with thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer were introduced in 2009, which might attribute in the subsequent sharp rise in the usage of TBSRTC [6,16]. Forty-one out of the 74 institutes used conventional method for FNA, whereas 11 institutes used liquid-based method; the remaining 22 adopted both. Out of the 33 institutes using liquidbased preparation, 10 had started doing so in 2010. Regarding the preparation method for liquid-based FNA, two representative commercial methods, Thin-prep and Sure-path, were predominant: almost every institute chose one or the other method. Core needle biopsy was being done in 21 institutes (27% of the 77). Among them, four institutes (5% of the 77) used both core needle biopsy and FNA as the primary investigation method of thyroid nodules. In thirty-eight institutes (51.4%), FNA was done by radiologists, followed by clinicians of internal medicine, surgeons, pathologists, and thyroid-specialized clinicians.

The survey indicated that the majority of the FNA specimens in Korea (60/74, 81%) were being diagnosed as per TBSRTC as of 2007. Moreover, the preparation method also shifted from conventional to liquid-based, the latter adopted in about 43% (33/77) including the institutes performing both.

Incidence and malignancy rate of each DC of TBSRTC in Korea

Sixteen out of 74 institutes answering the survey reported the results of thyroid FNA by TBSRTC. The mean distribution of six categories from 42,132 cases of 16 institutes was as follows: 11.1% nondiagnostic, 62.3% benign, 9.7% AUS, 0.9% FN, 6.7% SM, and 9.1% malignancy (Table 2). The mean operation rates of each category were as follows: 7.5% nondiagnostic, 2.4% benign, 20.2% AUS, 43.7% FN, 59.9% SM, and 69.2% malignancy (Table 3).

The average of malignancy rates for resected cases of 15 institutes are shown in Table 4: nondiagnostic, 45.6%; benign, 16.5%; AUS, 68.7%; FN, 30.2%; SM, 97.5%; and malignancy, 99.7%. Relatively high malignancy rates were noted in nondiagnostic and benign categories, which might have resulted from false-negative results of clinically suspicious nodules. Overall, the false-positive rate of the SM and malignancy category combined was 1.23%.

Follow-up histologic diagnosis of each categories of TBSRTC

The final histological diagnoses upon resection are listed in Table 5. Each DC is sub-classified according to the recommendation of TBSRTC and follow-up histologic diagnoses are summarized by the sub-classification of each DC.

Of 4,599 cases, 247 were operated in the non-DC (DC I) and 128 cases (51.8%) were revealed as malignant nodules. The malignant cases mainly consisted of papillary thyroid carcinoma (121 cases), followed by five cases of follicular carcinoma, one case of poorly differentiated carcinoma, and one case of lymphoma. The benign category (DC II) had 422 cases of follow-up operation out of 21,399 cases. Among them, 320 (75.8%) were revealed as benign nodules and 102 cases (24.2%) were malignant: 89 papillary thyroid carcinomas, 12 follicular carcinomas, and one medullary carcinoma. Out of the 3,708 AUS-categorized cases, 722 had follow-up surgical resection (Table 3). The 514 cases (71.2%) with malignant histologic diagnoses consisted of 471 cases of papillary carcinoma, 25 cases of follicular carcinoma, 13 of medullary carcinoma, four of Hurthle cell carcinoma, and one of poorly differentiated carcinoma. The remaining 208 (28.8%) cases were proved to be benign lesions. In DC VI (FN), 121 out of 283 cases had surgical resection. Forty-six cases out of 121 cases (38%) were malignant: 23 cases of follicular carcinoma, 20 of papillary carcinoma, and three of Hurthle cell carcinoma. The remaining cases (75 cases, 61.9%) that were proved to be benign included 36 follicular adenomas, 19 nodular hyperplasia, 16 Hurthle cell adenomas, and four lymphocytic thyroiditis (Table 5). A total of 1,133 cases of DC V were histologically confirmed as benign nodules in 32 cases (2.8 %) and malignancy in 1,101 cases (97.2%): 1,094 cases of papillary carcinoma and seven cases of medullary carcinoma (Table 5). Lastly, DC VI (malignancy) had 2,439 resected cases out of 3,343 FNAs. Overall, the final histologic diagnoses were well correlated with preoperative FNA diagnoses. Out of 2,439 cases, 2,419 (99.6%) with a preoperative diagnosis of papillary carcinoma on FNA sub-classification were proved to be papillary carcinoma upon resection. Only 20 out of 2,439 resected cases were non-papillary thyroid carcinoma lesions including one follicular carcinoma, three medullary carcinomas, two poorly differentiated carcinomas, one undifferentiated carcinoma, one metastatic carcinoma, and 12 various benign lesions (Table 5).

Diagnostic values for TBSRTC in Korea

Through the data obtained by the survey summarized above, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were analyzed in two ways. First, we included only those in the benign category (DC II) as negative and malignant categories (DC V and VI) as positive. In this analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for malignant thyroid tumors were 97.19%, 87.91%, 98.76%, and 75.83%, respectively. Second, we included FN (DC IV) cases as positive and calculated each parameter for the neoplasm including both benign and malignant. In this case, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for neoplasm of thyroid were 97.14%, 72.89%, 96.78%, and 75.83%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

TBSRTC was proposed in October 2007 in Bethesda, Maryland, and published in 2009,1 TBSRTC was then immediately introduced in the 2009 guidelines of the KTA [6,16]. Despite the information about TBSRTC having been globally disseminated, the status of its usage in clinical practice in Korea has been unknown. This questionnaire provides a cross-sectional view, based on the collective data from participating pathology laboratories, of the degree of implementation of TBSRTC in Korea and evaluates its impact on daily practice by assessing the incidence and malignant risk of each DC at each pathology laboratory using TBSRTC.

Overall, the data shows that TBSRTC is well implemented in Korea. As of July 2012 (when the questionnaire was mailed), 81% (60 out of 74) of the participating pathology laboratories were already using TBSRTC, which is higher than the rate given in published data from the College of American Pathologists [17]. In addition, the data demonstrates interesting technical points. Fifty-seven percent of the laboratories are using conventional alcohol-fixed direct smears as a preparatory method for thyroid FNA; in contrast, 14.9% of the laboratories are using liquid-based cytology and 29.7% are using both. Overall, 44.6% of the laboratories are using liquid based cytology. Twenty-one out of 74 pathology laboratories (27%) received thyroid core needle biopsies; among them, four institutes used both core needle biopsy and FNA as the primary diagnostic test for thyroid nodules. Although core needle biopsy of thyroid nodules is emerging as an effective alternative method, the primary use of core needle biopsy in a thyroid nodule is quite unusual. For example, current American Thyroid Association thyroid nodule management guidelines and the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Statement have not included core biopsy as an evaluation tool of thyroid nodule, and some other studies suggest that after several non-diagnostic FNA, surgical excision should be considered appropriate [18,19].

More importantly, our data showed some differences in the incidence and malignant risk of certain categories between TBSRTC1 or published studies from other countries [7,12] and the current results. As shown in Table 2, lower incidence of DC IV (0.9±0.8%) and higher incidence of DC III (9.7±4.6%), DC V (6.7±4.1%), and DC VI (9.1±5.5%) were demonstrated. Moreover, the malignancy rates of DC I, II, III, and V (mean of malignancy rates: 46.5±33.5, 16.5±13.1, 68.7±15.8, and 97.5±4.5, respectively) in our study were higher than the risk of malignancy indicated by the original TBSRTC (1%–4%, DC I; 0%–3%, DC II; 5%–15%, DC III, and 60%–75%, DC V) [1] and other previous studies [11,18-24]. However, these findings are consistently shown in previous reports from Korea [8,9]. These can be explained by several reasons. First, in Korea, the prevalence of papillary thyroid carcinoma is more than 95%, whereas that of follicular carcinoma is very low, at 3.2% [6], which has resulted in the lower incidence of DC IV and higher incidence of DC III, V, and VI. In addition, higher prevalence of papillary thyroid carcinoma might influence higher malignant rates of DC II, DC III, and DC V. Second, most institutes submitting their details of TBSRTC are university-based tertiary centers. In tertiary referral institutes, the patients who had been diagnosed with suspicious or malignant nodules at primary care centers were more likely to receive an operation despite a DC III or DC V diagnosis of FNA, especially those whose imaging studies strongly suggest malignancy. In the present study, malignancy rates were calculated based on the resected cases. The malignancy rate assessed either in the total fine needle aspiration cytology cases or in the resected cases cannot be said to represent the exact malignancy rate of each DC of TBSRTC. The former can miss unresected malignant tumors, and the latter can be exaggerated by selection bias, which may occur in this type of retrospective study. Therefore, our malignancy rates cannot be directly compared with the malignant risk recommended in TBSRTC. Lastly, because Korean citizens tend to consider false-positive results more significantly than false-negative results, cytopathologists in Korea may have a tendency to under-diagnose FNA of thyroid nodules [10].

There are some limitations in the data derived from this questionnaire, especially those evaluating the incidence and malignancy rate of each DC in TBSRTC, as mentioned above. First, 14 out of 16 institutes submitting the incidence and malignancy rate of TBSRTC are university-based centers. Therefore, the results of this survey may not be truly representative of all kinds of practices; from community to academic. Second, all data are self-reported and not verified. Third, the data might not reflect the current status in certain aspects because the questionnaire was mailed in July 2012. The implementation of TBSRTC is more widespread in Korea at present, and liquid-based cytology and core needle biopsy are likely to have been adopted more widely. The usage of core needle biopsy in thyroid nodules has been actively studied in Korea [25].

In conclusion, overall, TBSRTC has been well adopted in Korea, with more than 80% of institutes using TBSRTC as of 2012. However, ongoing education is still necessary to reduce the variation of incidence and malignant rates of TBSRTC. Moreover, it would be better to modify reference values of malignancy rate of each category of TBSRTC and revisit the guidelines for treating patients with thyroid nodules in Korea based on the results of this study. Finally, it is highly recommended that each institute review their report of thyroid aspiration and have their own incidence and malignant rates for each DC.

Acknowledgments

REFERENCES

• 1. Cibas ES, Ali SZS; NCI Thyroid FNA State of the Science Conference. The Bethesda System For Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol 2009; 132: 658-65. ArticlePubMed
• 2. Bongiovanni M, Krane JF, Cibas ES, Faquin WC. The atypical thyroid fine-needle aspiration: past, present, and future. Cancer Cytopathol 2012; 120: 73-86. ArticlePubMed
• 3. Crowe A, Linder A, Hameed O, et al. The impact of implementation of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology on the quality of reporting, “risk” of malignancy, surgical rate, and rate of frozen sections requested for thyroid lesions. Cancer Cytopathol 2011; 119: 315-21. ArticlePubMed
• 4. Ozluk Y, Pehlivan E, Gulluoglu MG, et al. The use of the Bethesda terminology in thyroid fine-needle aspiration results in a lower rate of surgery for nonmalignant nodules: a report from a reference center in Turkey. Int J Surg Pathol 2011; 19: 761-71. ArticlePubMed
• 5. Horne MJ, Chhieng DC, Theoharis C, et al. Thyroid follicular lesion of undetermined significance: Evaluation of the risk of malignancy using the two-tier sub-classification. Diagn Cytopathol 2012; 40: 410-5. ArticlePubMed
• 6. Yi KH, Park YJ, Koong SS, et al. Revised Korean Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer. Endocrinol Metab 2010; 25: 270-97. Article
• 7. Kim SK, Hwang TS, Yoo YB, et al. Surgicalresults of thyroid nodules according to a management guideline based on the BRAF (V600E) mutation status. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96: 658-64. ArticlePubMed
• 8. Lee YB, Cho YY, Jang JY, et al. Current status and diagnostic values of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology in a papillary thyroid carcinoma-prevalent area. Head Neck 2017; 39: 269-74. ArticlePubMed
• 9. Park JH, Yoon SO, Son EJ, Kim HM, Nahm JH, Hong S. Incidence and malignancy rates of diagnoses in the bethesda system for reporting thyroid aspiration cytology: an institutional experience. Korean J Pathol 2014; 48: 133-9. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 10. Lee K, Jung CK, Lee KY, Bae JS, Lim DJ, Jung SL. Application of Bethesda system for reporting thyroid aspiration cytology. Korean J Pathol 2010; 44: 521-7. Article
• 11. Bongiovanni M, Spitale A, Faquin WC, Mazzucchelli L, Baloch ZW. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: a meta-analysis. Acta Cytol 2012; 56: 333-9. ArticlePubMed
• 12. Ohori NP, Schoedel KE. Variability in the atypia of undetermined significance/follicularlesion of undetermined significance diagnosis in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: sources and recommendations. Acta Cytol 2011; 55: 492-8. ArticlePubMed
• 13. Mathur A, Najafian A, Schneider EB, Zeiger MA, Olson MT. Malignancy risk and reproducibility associated with atypia of undetermined significance on thyroid cytology. Surgery 2014; 156: 1471-6. ArticlePubMed
• 14. Ho AS, Sarti EE, Jain KS, et al. Malignancy rate in thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda category III (AUS/FLUS). Thyroid 2014; 24: 832-9. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 15. VanderLaan PA, Marqusee E, Krane JF. Clinical outcome for atypia of undetermined significance in thyroid fine-needle aspirations: should repeated fna be the preferred initial approach? Am J Clin Pathol 2011; 135: 770-5. ArticlePubMed
• 16. Yi KH, Park YJ, Koong SS, et al. Revised Korean Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2011; 54: 8-36. Article
• 17. Auger M, Nayar R, Khalbuss WE, et al. Implementation of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: observations from the 2011 thyroid supplemental questionnaire of the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013; 137: 1555-9. ArticlePubMed
• 18. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016; 26: 1-133. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 19. Samir AE, Vij A, Seale MK, et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous thyroid nodule core biopsy: clinical utility in patients with prior nondiagnostic fine-needle aspirate. Thyroid 2012; 22: 461-7. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 20. Yang J, Schnadig V, Logrono R, Wasserman PG. Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: a study of 4703 patients with histologic and clinical correlations. Cancer 2007; 111: 306-15. ArticlePubMed
• 21. Yassa L, Cibas ES, Benson CB, et al. Long-term assessment of a multidisciplinary approach to thyroid nodule diagnostic evaluation. Cancer 2007; 111: 508-16. ArticlePubMed
• 22. Mufti ST, Molah R. The bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a five-yearretrospective review of one center experience. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 2012; 6: 159-73. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 23. Baloch ZW, Hendreen S, Gupta PK, et al. Interinstitutional review of thyroid fine-needle aspirations: impact on clinical management of thyroid nodules. Diagn Cytopathol 2001; 25: 231-4. ArticlePubMed
• 24. Wu HH, Rose C, Elsheikh TM. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: An experience of 1,382 cases in a community practice setting with the implication forrisk of neoplasm and risk of malignancy. Diagn Cytopathol 2012; 40: 399-403. ArticlePubMed
• 25. Yi KS, Kim JH, Na DG, et al. Usefulness of core needle biopsy for thyroid nodules with macrocalcifications: comparison with fine-needle aspiration. Thyroid 2015; 25: 657-64. ArticlePubMedPMC

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Improved Diagnostic Accuracy of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology with Artificial Intelligence Technology
  Yujin Lee, Mohammad Rizwan Alam, Hongsik Park, Kwangil Yim, Kyung Jin Seo, Gisu Hwang, Dahyeon Kim, Yeonsoo Chung, Gyungyub Gong, Nam Hoon Cho, Chong Woo Yoo, Yosep Chong, Hyun Joo Choi
  Thyroid®.2024; 34(6): 723.     CrossRef
• Welcoming the new, revisiting the old: a brief glance at cytopathology reporting systems for lung, pancreas, and thyroid
  Rita Luis, Balamurugan Thirunavukkarasu, Deepali Jain, Sule Canberk
  Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2024; 58(4): 165.     CrossRef
• Predictors of Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules Classified as Bethesda Category III
  Xiaoli Liu, Jingjing Wang, Wei Du, Liyuan Dai, Qigen Fang
  Frontiers in Endocrinology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Risk stratification of indeterminate thyroid nodules by novel multigene testing: a study of Asians with a high risk of malignancy
  Chunfang Hu, Weiwei Jing, Qing Chang, Zhihui Zhang, Zhenrong Liu, Jian Cao, Linlin Zhao, Yue Sun, Cong Wang, Huan Zhao, Ting Xiao, Huiqin Guo
  Molecular Oncology.2022; 16(8): 1680.     CrossRef
• CD56 Expression in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Is Highly Dependent on the Histologic Subtype: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall
  Uiju Cho, Yourha Kim, Sora Jeon, Chan Kwon Jung
  Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology.2022; 30(5): 389.     CrossRef
• Malignancy rates in thyroid nodules: a long-term cohort study of 17,592 patients
  M Grussendorf, I Ruschenburg, G Brabant
  European Thyroid Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Subclassification of the Bethesda Category III (AUS/FLUS): A study of thyroid FNA cytology based on ThinPrep slides from the National Cancer Center in China
  Huan Zhao, HuiQin Guo, LinLin Zhao, Jian Cao, Yue Sun, Cong Wang, ZhiHui Zhang
  Cancer Cytopathology.2021; 129(8): 642.     CrossRef
• Effect of the Noninvasive Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm With Papillary-Like Nuclear Features (NIFTP) Nomenclature Revision on Indian Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Practice
  Chanchal Rana, Pooja Ramakant, Divya Goel, Akanksha Singh, KulRanjan Singh, Suresh Babu, Anand Mishra
  American Journal of Clinical Pathology.2021; 156(2): 320.     CrossRef
• Comprehensive DNA Methylation Profiling Identifies Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers for Thyroid Cancer
  Jong-Lyul Park, Sora Jeon, Eun-Hye Seo, Dong Hyuck Bae, Young Mun Jeong, Yourha Kim, Ja Seong Bae, Seon-Kyu Kim, Chan Kwon Jung, Yong Sung Kim
  Thyroid.2020; 30(2): 192.     CrossRef
• Differences in surgical resection rate and risk of malignancy in thyroid cytopathology practice between Western and Asian countries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
  Huy Gia Vuong, Hanh Thi Tuyet Ngo, Andrey Bychkov, Chan Kwon Jung, Trang Huyen Vu, Kim Bach Lu, Kennichi Kakudo, Tetsuo Kondo
  Cancer Cytopathology.2020; 128(4): 238.     CrossRef
• Thyroid cancer among patients with thyroid nodules in Yemen: a three-year retrospective study in a tertiary center and a specialty clinic
  Butheinah A. Al-Sharafi, Jamila A. AlSanabani, Ibraheem M. Alboany, Amani M. Shamsher
  Thyroid Research.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Is Bethesda classification sufficient to predict thyroid cancer in endemic regions?
  Gamze ÇITLAK, Bahar CANBAY TORUN
  Journal of Surgery and Medicine.2020; 4(9): 794.     CrossRef
• Preoperative diagnostic categories of fine needle aspiration cytology for histologically proven thyroid follicular adenoma and carcinoma, and Hurthle cell adenoma and carcinoma: Analysis of cause of under- or misdiagnoses
  Hee Young Na, Jae Hoon Moon, June Young Choi, Hyeong Won Yu, Woo-Jin Jeong, Yeo Koon Kim, Ji-Young Choe, So Yeon Park, Paula Soares
  PLOS ONE.2020; 15(11): e0241597.     CrossRef
• Nuclear features of papillary thyroid carcinoma: Comparison of Core needle biopsy and thyroidectomy specimens
  Jae Yeon Seok, Jungsuk An, Hyun Yee Cho, Younghye Kim, Seung Yeon Ha
  Annals of Diagnostic Pathology.2018; 32: 35.     CrossRef
• Clinical utility of EZH1 mutations in the diagnosis of follicular-patterned thyroid tumors
  Chan Kwon Jung, Yourha Kim, Sora Jeon, Kwanhoon Jo, Sohee Lee, Ja Seong Bae
  Human Pathology.2018; 81: 9.     CrossRef
• The History of Korean Thyroid Pathology
  Soon Won Hong, Chan Kwon Jung
  International Journal of Thyroidology.2018; 11(1): 15.     CrossRef
• Thyroid FNA cytology in Asian practice—Active surveillance for indeterminate thyroid nodules reduces overtreatment of thyroid carcinomas
  K. Kakudo, M. Higuchi, M. Hirokawa, S. Satoh, C. K. Jung, A. Bychkov
  Cytopathology.2017; 28(6): 455.     CrossRef
• Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Practice in Korea
  Yoon Jin Cha, Ju Yeon Pyo, SoonWon Hong, Jae Yeon Seok, Kyung-Ju Kim, Jee-Young Han, Jeong Mo Bae, Hyeong Ju Kwon, Yeejeong Kim, Kyueng-Whan Min, Soonae Oak, Sunhee Chang
  Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2017; 51(6): 521.     CrossRef
• Current Practices of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration in Asia: A Missing Voice
  Andrey Bychkov, Kennichi Kakudo, SoonWon Hong
  Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2017; 51(6): 517.     CrossRef
• Current Status of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Practice in Thailand
  Somboon Keelawat, Samreung Rangdaeng, Supinda Koonmee, Tikamporn Jitpasutham, Andrey Bychkov
  Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2017; 51(6): 565.     CrossRef