Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
224 "Breast"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Article
Article image
International Academy of Cytology standardized reporting of breast fine-needle aspiration cytology with cyto-histopathological correlation of breast carcinoma
Shweta Pai
J Pathol Transl Med. 2024;58(5):241-248.   Published online September 13, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2024.07.14
  • 907 View
  • 161 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
The International Academy of Cytology (IAC) has developed a standardized approach for reporting the findings of breast fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Accordingly, there are five chief categories of breast lesions, C1 (insufficient material), C2 (benign), C3 (atypical), C4 (suspicious), and C5 (malignant). The prognostication and management of breast carcinoma can be performed readily on the basis of this classification system. The aim of this study was to classify various breast lesions into one of the above-named categories and to further grade the C5 lesions specifically using the Robinson system. The latter grades were then correlated with modified Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grades.
Methods
This retrospective study was undertaken in the pathology department of a hospital located in the urban part of the city of Bangalore. All FNAC procedures performed on breast lumps spanning the year 2020 were included in the study.
Results
A total of 205 breast lesions was classified according to the IAC guidelines into C1 (6 cases, 2.9%), C2 (151 cases, 73.7%), C3 (13 cases, 6.3%), C4 (5 cases, 2.5%), and C5 (30 cases, 14.6%) groups. The C5 cases were further graded using Robinson’s system. The latter showed a significant correlation with the SBR system (concordance=83.3%, Spearman correlation=0.746, Kendall’s tau-b=0.736, kappa=0.661, standard error=0.095, p≤.001).
Conclusions
A standardized approach for FNAC reporting of breast lesions, as advocated for by the IAC, improves the quality and clarity of the reports and assures diagnostic reproducibility on a global scale. Further, the cytological grading of C5 lesions provides reliable cyto-prognostic scores that can help assess a tumor’s aggressiveness and predict its histological grade.
Case Study
Article image
Metastatic choroidal melanoma in the breast: a case report and review of the literature
Loay Abudalu, Vinisha Malhotra, Nabila Nasir, Sami Titi
J Pathol Transl Med. 2023;57(4):238-241.   Published online July 11, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2023.06.07
  • 2,054 View
  • 115 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
The breast is an unusual site for metastases, accounting for less than 2% of malignant breast lesions but include those from malignant melanomas, carcinomas, sarcomas, and lymphomas from various organs. We diagnosed a very rare case of metastatic choroidal melanoma for a 67-year-old female who presented with a right breast lump and who had been previously diagnosed with choroidal melanoma-monosomy 3 in 2017. To the best of our knowledge, only five such cases have been published so far, with one in a male patient.
Original Articles
Article image
A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Evi Abada, Hyejeong Jang, Seongho Kim, Rouba Ali-Fehmi, Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay
J Pathol Transl Med. 2022;56(6):342-353.   Published online October 27, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2022.08.31
  • 2,529 View
  • 129 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Background
We aimed to study the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) (CD117, c-Myc, and p53) characteristics, and overall survival of primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma (BAS).
Methods
This was a retrospective study of BAS cases diagnosed between 1997 and 2020 at our institution. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were reviewed for tumor morphology, margin status, and lymph node metastasis. CD117, p53, D2-40, CD31, and c-Myc IHC stains were performed on 11 viable tissue blocks. Additional clinical information was obtained from the electronic medical records.
Results
Seventeen patients with BAS were identified. Of these, five (29%) were primary and 12 (71%) were secondary BAS, respectively. The median age at diagnosis for primary BAS was 36 years. The median age at diagnosis for secondary BAS was 67 years. The median time to secondary BAS development following radiotherapy was 6.5 years (range, 2 to 12 years). There was no significant difference between primary and secondary BAS in several histopathologic parameters examined, including histologic grade, necrosis, mitotic count, lymph node metastasis, and positive tumor margins. There was also no difference in CD117, p53, D2-40, CD31, and c-Myc expression by IHC between primary and secondary BAS. During a median followup of 21 months, primary BAS had two (40%) reported deaths and secondary BAS had three (25%) reported deaths. However, this difference in survival between both groups was not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 3.28; p = .450).
Conclusions
BAS is a rare and aggressive disease. No histologic, IHC (CD117, c-Myc, and p53), or survival differences were identified between primary and secondary BAS in this study.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Etiology, pathogenesis, and management of angiosarcoma associated with implants and foreign body: Clinical cases and research updates
    Ramy Samargandi
    Medicine.2024; 103(18): e37932.     CrossRef
  • Ovarian angiosarcoma: A systematic review of literature and survival analysis
    Shafi Rehman, Arya Harikrishna, Amisha Silwal, B.R. Sumie, Safdar Mohamed, Nisha Kolhe, Meghana Maddi, Linh Huynh, Jesus Gutierrez, Yoshita Rao Annepu, Ameer Mustafa Farrukh
    Annals of Diagnostic Pathology.2024; 73: 152331.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for radiation associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast: A retrospective single center study
    Stijn J.C. van der Burg, Sophie J.M. Reijers, Anke Kuijpers, Lotte Heimans, Astrid N. Scholten, Rick L.M. Haas, Hester van Boven, Willemijn M. Kolff, Marie-Jeanne T.F.D. Vrancken Peeters, Martijn Kerst, Beatrijs A. Seinstra, Neeltje Steeghs, Winette T.A.
    The Breast.2024; 78: 103825.     CrossRef
  • Primary ovarian angiosarcoma: Two case reports and review of literature
    Ying Zhou, Yi-Wen Sun, Xiao-Yang Liu, Dan-Hua Shen
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2023; 11(21): 5122.     CrossRef
Article image
Fatty acid synthetase expression in triple-negative breast cancer
Jin Hee Park, Hye Seung Han, So Dug Lim, Wook Youn Kim, Kyoung Sik Park, Young Bum Yoo, Seung Eun Lee, Wan-Seop Kim
J Pathol Transl Med. 2022;56(2):73-80.   Published online January 21, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2021.10.27
  • 4,293 View
  • 189 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has a relatively poor prognosis. Research has identified potential metabolic targets, including fatty acid metabolism, in TNBC. The absence of effective target therapies for TNBC led to exploration of the role of fatty acid synthetase (FASN) as a potential target for TNBC therapy. Here, we analyzed the expression of FASN, a representative lipid metabolism–related protein, and investigated the association between FASN expression and Ki-67 and the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) biomarkers in TNBC.
Methods
Immunohistochemical expression of FASN was analyzed in 166 patients with TNBC. For analytical purposes, patients with 0–1+ FASN staining were grouped as low-grade FASN and patients with 2–3+ FASN staining as high-grade FASN.
Results
FASN expression was observed in 47.1% of TNBC patients. Low and high expression of FASN was identified in 75.9% and 24.1%, respectively, and no statistically significant difference was found in T category, N category, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, or recurrence rate between the low and high-FASN expression groups. Ki-67 proliferation level was significantly different between the low and high-FASN expression groups. FASN expression was significantly related to Ki-67 as the level increased. There was no significant difference in PD-L1 positivity between the low- and high-FASN expression groups.
Conclusions
We identified FASN expression in 166 TNBC patients. The Ki-67 proliferation index was positively correlated with FASN level, indicating higher proliferation activity as FASN increases. However, there was no statistical association with PD-L1 SP142, the currently FDA-approved assay, or FASN expression level.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Protein biomarkers for diagnosis of breast cancer
    Emeka Eze Joshua Iweala, Doris Nnenna Amuji, Faith Chinasaokwu Nnaji
    Scientific African.2024; 25: e02308.     CrossRef
  • Microarray analysis points to LMNB1 and JUN as potential target genes for predicting metastasis promotion by etoposide in colorectal cancer
    Jiafei Liu, Hongjie Yang, Peng Li, Yuanda Zhou, Zhichun Zhang, Qingsheng Zeng, Xipeng Zhang, Yi Sun
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The signature of extracellular vesicles in hypoxic breast cancer and their therapeutic engineering
    Baiheng Zhu, Kehao Xiang, Tanghua Li, Xin Li, Fujun Shi
    Cell Communication and Signaling.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • NFYA promotes malignant behavior of triple-negative breast cancer in mice through the regulation of lipid metabolism
    Nobuhiro Okada, Chihiro Ueki, Masahiro Shimazaki, Goki Tsujimoto, Susumu Kohno, Hayato Muranaka, Kiyotsugu Yoshikawa, Chiaki Takahashi
    Communications Biology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Role of EGFR and FASN in breast cancer progression
    Suchi Chaturvedi, Mainak Biswas, Sushabhan Sadhukhan, Avinash Sonawane
    Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling.2023; 17(4): 1249.     CrossRef
  • Bioinformatics Method Was Used to Analyze the Highly Expressed Gene FAM83A of Breast Cancer in Young Women
    Yongzhe Tang, Hao Wang, Qi He, Yuanyuan Chen, Jie Wang, Fahd Abd Algalil
    Applied Bionics and Biomechanics.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • NCAPH promotes proliferation as well as motility of breast cancer cells by activating the PI3K/AKT pathway
    Ting Zhang, Peng Li, Wanying Guo, Qipeng Liu, Weiqiang Qiao, Miao Deng
    Physiology International.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
Article image
A multicenter study of interobserver variability in pathologic diagnosis of papillary breast lesions on core needle biopsy with WHO classification
Hye Ju Kang, Sun Young Kwon, Ahrong Kim, Woo Gyeong Kim, Eun Kyung Kim, Ae Ree Kim, Chungyeul Kim, Soo Kee Min, So Young Park, Sun Hee Sung, Hye Kyoung Yoon, Ahwon Lee, Ji Shin Lee, Hyang Im Lee, Ho Chang Lee, Sung Chul Lim, Sun Young Jun, Min Jung Jung, Chang Won Jung, Soo Youn Cho, Eun Yoon Cho, Hye Jeong Choi, So Yeon Park, Jee Yeon Kim, In Ae Park, Youngmee Kwon
J Pathol Transl Med. 2021;55(6):380-387.   Published online October 6, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2021.07.29
  • 4,467 View
  • 205 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Background
Papillary breast lesions (PBLs) comprise diverse entities from benign and atypical lesions to malignant tumors. Although PBLs are characterized by a papillary growth pattern, it is challenging to achieve high diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility. Thus, we investigated the diagnostic reproducibility of PBLs in core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens with World Health Organization (WHO) classification.
Methods
Diagnostic reproducibility was assessed using interobserver variability (kappa value, κ) and agreement rate in the pathologic diagnosis of 60 PBL cases on CNB among 20 breast pathologists affiliated with 20 medical institutions in Korea. This analysis was performed using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for cytokeratin 5 (CK5) and p63. The pathologic diagnosis of PBLs was based on WHO classification, which was used to establish simple classifications (4-tier, 3-tier, and 2-tier).
Results
On WHO classification, H&E staining exhibited ‘fair agreement’ (κ = 0.21) with a 47.0% agreement rate. Simple classifications presented improvement in interobserver variability and agreement rate. IHC staining increased the kappa value and agreement rate in all the classifications. Despite IHC staining, the encapsulated/solid papillary carcinoma (EPC/SPC) subgroup (κ = 0.16) exhibited lower agreement compared to the non-EPC/SPC subgroup (κ = 0.35) with WHO classification, which was similar to the results of any other classification systems.
Conclusions
Although the use of IHC staining for CK5 and p63 increased the diagnostic agreement of PBLs in CNB specimens, WHO classification exhibited a higher discordance rate compared to any other classifications. Therefore, this result warrants further intensive consensus studies to improve the diagnostic reproducibility of PBLs with WHO classification.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Invasive papillary carcinoma of the breast
    Shijing Wang, Qingfu Zhang, Xiaoyun Mao
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recommendations for Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning in Pathology: A Concept Paper From the College of American Pathologists
    Matthew G. Hanna, Niels H. Olson, Mark Zarella, Rajesh C. Dash, Markus D. Herrmann, Larissa V. Furtado, Michelle N. Stram, Patricia M. Raciti, Lewis Hassell, Alex Mays, Liron Pantanowitz, Joseph S. Sirintrapun, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Anil Parwani, Giovann
    Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.2024; 148(10): e335.     CrossRef
  • Encapsulated papillary carcinoma of the breast: A single institution experience
    Liang Xu, Qixin Mao, Qiuming Liu, Yufeng Gao, Lihua Luo, Chungen Guo, Wei Qu, Ningning Yan, Yali Cao
    Oncology Letters.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • High-risk and selected benign breast lesions diagnosed on core needle biopsy: Evidence for and against immediate surgical excision
    Aparna Harbhajanka, Hannah L. Gilmore, Benjamin C. Calhoun
    Modern Pathology.2022; 35(11): 1500.     CrossRef
Article image
Potential of AKT2 expression as a predictor of lymph-node metastasis in invasive breast carcinoma of no special type
Primariadewi Rustamadji, Elvan Wiyarta, Kristina Anna Bethania, Kusmardi Kusmardi
J Pathol Transl Med. 2021;55(4):271-278.   Published online June 14, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2021.04.26
  • 3,517 View
  • 149 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
Invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST) is the most common type of breast cancer and mainly causes regional lymph-node metastasis (LNM). We investigated the potential for AKT2 expression as a predictive biomarker for LNM in IBC-NST.
Methods
Forty-eight paraffin blocks containing IBC-NST primary tumors were divided into two groups based on presence or absence of LNM. Age, tumor grade, tumor size, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and AKT expression were assessed. AKT2 expression was assessed based on immunohistochemical staining, while other data were collected from archives.
Results
Multiple logistic regression results showed that AKT2 expression and LVI were significantly associated with LNM (odds ratio [OR], 5.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42 to 19.93 and OR, 4.46; 95% CI, 1.17 to 16.97, respectively). AKT2 expression was able to discriminate against LNM (area under the receiver operating characteristic, 0.799 ± 0.063; 95% CI, 0.676 to 0.921) at an H-score cutoff of 104.62 (83.3% sensitivity, 62.5% specificity).
Conclusions
AKT2 expression has potential as a predictor of LNM in IBC-NST. The H-score cutoff for AKT2 expression can be used as a classification guide in future studies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Association of Src with Nottingham Prognostic Index in Breast Cancer: Implications for Breast Cancer Prognostication
    Primariadewi Rustamadji, Elvan Wiyarta
    Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine.2024; 7(2): 90.     CrossRef
  • CD4+ Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-treated Invasive Breast Cancer of No Special Type
    Primariadewi Rustamadji, Elvan Wiyarta, Meike Pramono, Sinta Chaira Maulanisa
    Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine.2024; 7(3): 179.     CrossRef
  • Potential of AKNA as a Predictive Biomarker for Ovarian Cancer and Its Relationship to Tumor Grading
    P Rustamadji, E Wiyarta, M Miftahuzzakiyah, D Sukmawati, DA Suryandari, R Kodariah
    Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice.2024; 27(9): 1089.     CrossRef
  • Exploring the Expression of Survivin on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Invasive Breast Carcinoma
    Primariadewi Rustamadji, Elvan Wiyarta, Ineke Anggreani
    Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences.2022; 10(B): 1440.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Omega-3-Rich Fish Oil on TNF-  Expression in Mice's Colonic Tissue Induced with Azoxymethane (AOM) and Dextran Sodium Sulphate (DSS)
    Elvan Wiyarta, Kusmardi Kusmardi, Yurnadi Hanafi Midoen
    Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.2022; : 3179.     CrossRef
  • The potential of lunasin extract for the prevention of breast cancer progression by upregulating E-Cadherin and inhibiting ICAM-1
    Kusmardi Kusmardi, Elvan Wiyarta, Numlil Khaira Rusdi, Andi Muh. Maulana, Ari Estuningtyas, Hadi Sunaryo
    F1000Research.2021; 10: 902.     CrossRef
  • CD44 Variant Exon 6 Isoform Expression as a Potential Predictor of Lymph Node Metastasis in Invasive Breast Carcinoma of No Special Type
    Primariadewi Rustamadji, Elvan Wiyarta, Kristina A. Bethania, Rakesh Sathish Nair
    International Journal of Breast Cancer.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Correlation between CD 34 and CD 68 expression in placental malaria with maternal anemia
    Primariadewi Rustamadji, Muhammad Takbir, Puspita Eka Wuyung, Kusmardi Kusmardi, Elvan Wiyarta
    Tropical Parasitology.2021; 11(2): 92.     CrossRef
Review
Article image
Standardized pathology report for breast cancer
Soo Youn Cho, So Yeon Park, Young Kyung Bae, Jee Yeon Kim, Eun Kyung Kim, Woo Gyeong Kim, Youngmee Kwon, Ahwon Lee, Hee Jin Lee, Ji Shin Lee, Jee Young Park, Gyungyub Gong, Hye Kyoung Yoon
J Pathol Transl Med. 2021;55(1):1-15.   Published online January 11, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2020.11.20
  • 9,047 View
  • 626 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Given the recent advances in management and understanding of breast cancer, a standardized pathology report reflecting these changes is critical. To meet this need, the Breast Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists has developed a standardized pathology reporting format for breast cancer, consisting of ‘standard data elements,’ ‘conditional data elements,’ and a biomarker report form. The ‘standard data elements’ consist of the basic pathologic features used for prognostication, while other factors related to prognosis or diagnosis are described in the ‘conditional data elements.’ In addition to standard data elements, all recommended issues are also presented. We expect that this standardized pathology report for breast cancer will improve diagnostic concordance and communication between pathologists and clinicians, as well as between pathologists inter-institutionally.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Residual pure intralymphatic carcinoma component only (lymphovascular tumor emboli without invasive carcinoma) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with poor outcome: Not pathologic complete response
    Hyunwoo Lee, Yunjeong Jang, Yoon Ah Cho, Eun Yoon Cho
    Human Pathology.2024; 145: 1.     CrossRef
  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with ductal carcinomain situ: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Matthew G. Davey, Colm O’Flaherty, Eoin F. Cleere, Aoife Nohilly, James Phelan, Evan Ronane, Aoife J. Lowery, Michael J. Kerin
    BJS Open.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
Original Article
Article image
Automated immunohistochemical assessment ability to evaluate estrogen and progesterone receptor status compared with quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in breast carcinoma patients
Taesung Jeon, Aeree Kim, Chungyeul Kim
J Pathol Transl Med. 2021;55(1):33-42.   Published online December 3, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2020.09.29
  • 7,809 View
  • 204 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
This study aimed to investigate the capability of an automated immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation of hormonal receptor status in breast cancer patients compared to a well-validated quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) method.
Methods
This study included 93 invasive breast carcinoma cases that had both standard IHC assay and Oncotype Dx assay results. The same paraffin blocks on which Oncotype Dx assay had been performed were selected. Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) receptor status were evaluated through IHC stains using SP1 monoclonal antibody for ER, and 1E2 monoclonal antibody for PR. All ER and PR immunostained slides were scanned, and invasive tumor areas were marked. Using the QuantCenter image analyzer provided by 3DHISTECH, IHC staining of hormone receptors was measured and converted to histochemical scores (H scores). Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between Oncotype Dx hormone receptor scores and H scores, and between Oncotype Dx scores and Allred scores.
Results
H scores measured by an automated imaging system showed high concordance with RT-qPCR scores. ER concordance was 98.9% (92/93), and PR concordance was 91.4% (85/93). The correlation magnitude between automated H scores and RT-qPCR scores was high and comparable to those of Allred scores (for ER, 0.51 vs. 0.37 [p=.121], for PR, 0.70 vs. 0.72 [p=.39]).
Conclusions
Automated H scores showed a high concordance with quantitative mRNA expression levels measured by RT-qPCR.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Vision Transformers for Breast Cancer Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Expression Staging without Immunohistochemical Staining
    Gelan Ayana, Eonjin Lee, Se-woon Choe
    The American Journal of Pathology.2024; 194(3): 402.     CrossRef
  • Extrahepatic Bile Duct Organoids as a Model to Study Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury During Liver Transplantation
    P. Kreiner, E. Eggenhofer, L. Schneider, C. Rejas, M. Goetz, N. Bogovic, S. M. Brunner, K. Evert, H. J. Schlitt, E. K. Geissler, H. Junger
    Transplant International.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Marker assessments inER‐positive breast cancers: old markers, new applications?
    Joshua J X Li, Gary M Tse
    Histopathology.2023; 82(2): 218.     CrossRef
  • The Story of the Magee Equations: The Ultimate in Applied Immunohistochemistry
    Rohit Bhargava, David J. Dabbs
    Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology.2023; 31(7): 490.     CrossRef
  • Dose-Dependent Relationship between Protection of Thioacetamide-Induced Acute Liver Injury and Hyperammonemia and Concentration of Lactobacillus salivarius Li01 in Mice
    Pengcheng Lou, Yangfan Shen, Aoxiang Zhuge, Longxian Lv, Xueling Zhu, Yin Yuan, Liya Yang, Kaicen Wang, Bo Li, Lanjuan Li, Joanna B. Goldberg
    Microbiology Spectrum.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
Reviews
Article image
Imaging features of breast cancer molecular subtypes: state of the art
Nariya Cho
J Pathol Transl Med. 2021;55(1):16-25.   Published online November 9, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2020.09.03
  • 48,849 View
  • 321 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Characterization of breast cancer molecular subtypes has been the standard of care for breast cancer management. We aimed to provide a review of imaging features of breast cancer molecular subtypes for the field of precision medicine. We also provide an update on the recent progress in precision medicine for breast cancer, implications for imaging, and recent observations in longitudinal functional imaging with radiomics.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Association of clinicopathologic and molecular factors with the occurrence of positive margins in breast cancer
    Anupama Praveen Kumar, Diego Vicente, Jianfang Liu, Praveen-Kumar Raj-Kumar, Brenda Deyarmin, Xiaoying Lin, Craig D. Shriver, Hai Hu
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 204(1): 15.     CrossRef
  • The association of magnetic resonance imaging features with five molecular subtypes of breast cancer
    Van Thi Nguyen, Duc Huu Duong, Quang Thai Nguyen, Duy Thai Nguyen, Thi Linh Tran, Tra Giang Duong
    European Journal of Radiology Open.2024; 13: 100585.     CrossRef
  • The effect of data resampling methods in radiomics
    Aydin Demircioğlu
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Treated Primary Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma With Later Metastasis Found in Clinical Presentation of Left Axilla Lymphadenopathy: A Case Report
    Brigitte L Cochran, Sara Eliseo, Austin Vaughn, Tamryn L Van Der Horn, Enzo Ferrara, Jamie Edwards
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pushing the envelope in breast conserving surgery − is multiple-wire localization (3 or more wires) associated with increased risk of compromised margins and long-term recurrence?
    Orit Golan, Marian Khatib, Tehillah S. Menes, Vivianne A.R. Freitas, Rivka Kessner, Rina Neeman, Michal Mauda-Havakuk, Diego Mercer, Yoav Amitai
    European Journal of Radiology.2024; 176: 111511.     CrossRef
  • A model combining BI-RADS® descriptors from pre-treatment B-mode breast ultrasound with clinicopathological tumor features shows promise in the prediction of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Panagiotis Kapetas, Reena Aggarwal, Basmah Altuwayjiri, Katja Pinker, Paola Clauser, Thomas H. Helbich, Pascal A.T. Baltzer
    European Journal of Radiology.2024; 178: 111649.     CrossRef
  • Correlations of Imaging and Therapy in Breast Cancer Based on Molecular Patterns: An Important Issue in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer
    Oana Maria Burciu, Ioan Sas, Tudor-Alexandru Popoiu, Adrian-Grigore Merce, Lavinia Moleriu, Ionut Marcel Cobec
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(15): 8506.     CrossRef
  • Access to prior screening mammograms affects the specificity but not sensitivity of radiologists' performance
    J.D. Akwo, P. D. (Yun) Trieu, M.L. Barron, T. Reynolds, S.J. Lewis
    Clinical Radiology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Histogram analysis of multi-model high-resolution diffusion-weighted MRI in breast cancer: correlations with molecular prognostic factors and subtypes
    Yanjin Qin, Feng Wu, Qilan Hu, Litong He, Min Huo, Caili Tang, Jingru Yi, Huiting Zhang, Ting Yin, Tao Ai
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • ASO Author Reflections: Sequence of Treatment in Clinically Node-Negative T1 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Kai Huang, James W. Jakub, Sarah A. McLaughlin
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(13): 8455.     CrossRef
  • Circulating non-coding RNAs as a diagnostic and management biomarker for breast cancer: current insights
    Hamed Hosseinalizadeh, Mehrdad Mahmoodpour, Ammar Ebrahimi
    Molecular Biology Reports.2022; 49(1): 705.     CrossRef
  • MRI as a biomarker for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis
    Francesca Galati, Veronica Rizzo, Rubina Manuela Trimboli, Endi Kripa, Roberto Maroncelli, Federica Pediconi
    BJR|Open.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multiparametric MRI Features of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes
    Madalina Szep, Roxana Pintican, Bianca Boca, Andra Perja, Magdalena Duma, Diana Feier, Bogdan Fetica, Dan Eniu, Sorin Marian Dudea, Angelica Chiorean
    Medicina.2022; 58(12): 1716.     CrossRef
  • Circulating tumor cells as prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer: current status and future prospects
    Evagelia Chantzara, Nikolaos Xenidis, Galatea Kallergi, Vassilis Georgoulias, Athanasios Kotsakis
    Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics.2021; 21(10): 1037.     CrossRef
Article image
Clinicopathological characteristics of BRCA-associated breast cancer in Asian patients
Eun-Kyu Kim, So Yeon Park, Sung-Won Kim
J Pathol Transl Med. 2020;54(4):265-275.   Published online May 14, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2020.04.07
  • 6,931 View
  • 236 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
BRCA1/2 germline mutations account for the majority of hereditary breast cancers. Since the identification of the BRCA genes, several attempts have been made to define the clinicopathological characteristics of BRCA-associated breast cancer in comparison with sporadic breast cancer. Asians constitute 60% of the world population, and although the incidence of breast cancer in Asia remains low compared to the West, breast cancer is the most prevalent female cancer in the region. The epidemiological aspects of breast cancer are different between Asians and Caucasians. Asian patients present with breast cancer at a younger age than Western patients. The contributions of BRCA1/2 mutations to breast cancer incidence are expected to differ between Asians and Caucasians, and the different genetic backgrounds among races are likely to influence the breast cancer phenotypes. However, most large-scale studies on the clinicopathological characteristics of BRCA-associated breast cancer have been on Western patients, while studies on Asian populations were small and sporadic. In this review, we provide an overview of the clinical and pathological characteristics of BRCA-associated breast cancer, incorporating findings on Asian patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Predicting BRCA mutation and stratifying targeted therapy response using multimodal learning: a multicenter study
    Yi Li, Xiaomin Xiong, Xiaohua Liu, Mengke Xu, Boping Yang, Xiaoju Li, Yu Li, Bo Lin, Bo Xu
    Annals of Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Characteristics of breast cancer patients tested for germline BRCA1/2 mutations by next‐generation sequencing in Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
    Songporn Oranratnachai, Watchalawalee Yamkaew, Atchara Tunteeratum, Thongchai Sukarayothin, Nareenart Iemwimangsa, Ravat Panvichien
    Cancer Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic and predictive biomarkers with therapeutic targets in breast cancer: A 2022 update on current developments, evidence, and recommendations
    Clement Chung, Vanessa T.Y. Yeung, Kenneth C.W. Wong
    Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice.2023; 29(6): 1343.     CrossRef
  • Mutations of TP53 and genes related to homologous recombination repair in breast cancer with germline BRCA1/2 mutations
    Jinyong Kim, Kyeonghun Jeong, Hyeji Jun, Kwangsoo Kim, Jeong Mo Bae, Myung Geun Song, Hanbaek Yi, Songyi Park, Go-un Woo, Dae-Won Lee, Tae-Yong Kim, Kyung-Hun Lee, Seock-Ah Im
    Human Genomics.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • BRCA 1–2 Incidence in Synchronous and Metachronous Breast Cancer: a Tertiary Center Study
    Ahmet Dağ, Bilal Arslan, Erkan Güler, Serdar Mermer
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Habitat Analysis of Breast Cancer-Enhanced MRI Reflects BRCA1 Mutation Determined by Immunohistochemistry
    Tianming Du, Haidong Zhao, Chen Li
    BioMed Research International.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence and Factors Associated with BRCA1/2 Gene Mutation in Chinese Populations with Breast Cancer
    Guoding Huang, Hongquan Lu, Qizhu Chen, Xinting Huang
    International Journal of General Medicine.2022; Volume 15: 6783.     CrossRef
  • Association between fertility treatments and breast cancer risk in women with a family history or BRCA mutations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiaojing Liu, Jing Yue, Ruqiya Pervaiz, Hanwang Zhang, Lan Wang
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Relationship between Baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT Semiquantitative Parameters and BRCA Mutational Status and Their Prognostic Role in Patients with Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma
    Francesco Dondi, Domenico Albano, Pietro Bellini, Luca Camoni, Giorgio Treglia, Francesco Bertagna
    Tomography.2022; 8(6): 2662.     CrossRef
  • The clinical and diagnostic characteristics of BRCA-associated breast cancer
    M.A. Golotyuk, A.A. Berezhnoy, N.V. Kazantseva, A.V. Dorofeev, S.A. Shevchenko, I.V. Borzunov, N.I. Rozhkova
    Onkologiya. Zhurnal imeni P.A.Gertsena.2022; 11(6): 18.     CrossRef
  • The Clinical and Pathological Profile of BRCA1 Gene Methylated Breast Cancer Women: A Meta-Analysis
    Ilary Ruscito, Maria Luisa Gasparri, Maria Paola De Marco, Flavia Costanzi, Aris Raad Besharat, Andrea Papadia, Thorsten Kuehn, Oreste Davide Gentilini, Filippo Bellati, Donatella Caserta
    Cancers.2021; 13(6): 1391.     CrossRef
  • Changing Patterns in Clinicopathological Characteristics of Breast Cancer and Prevalence of BRCA Mutations: Analysis in a Rural Area of Southern China
    Qiuming Wang, Heming Wu, Yongquan Lan, Jinhong Zhang, Jingna Wu, Yunuo Zhang, Liang Li, Donghua Liu, Jinfeng Zhang
    International Journal of General Medicine.2021; Volume 14: 7371.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Article image
Clinicopathologic characteristics of HER2-positive pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast
Yunjeong Jang, Hera Jung, Han-Na Kim, Youjeong Seo, Emad Alsharif, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Yeon Hee Park, Eun Yoon Cho, Soo Youn Cho
J Pathol Transl Med. 2020;54(1):95-102.   Published online November 13, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2019.10.24
  • 7,589 View
  • 274 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 18 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
Pure mucinous carcinoma (PMC) is a rare type of breast cancer, estimated to represent 2% of invasive breast cancer. PMC is typically positive for estrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) and negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). The clinicopathologic characteristics of HER2-positive PMC have not been investigated.
Methods
Pathology archives were searched for PMC diagnosed from January 1999 to April 2018. Clinicopathologic data and microscopic findings were reviewed and compared between HER2-positive PMC and HER2-negative PMC. We also analyzed the differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival according to clinicopathologic parameters including HER2 status in overall PMC cases.
Results
There were 21 HER2-positive cases (4.8%) in 438 PMCs. The average tumor size of HER2-positive PMC was 32.21 mm (± 26.55). Lymph node metastasis was present in seven cases. Compared to HER2-negative PMC, HER2-positive PMC presented with a more advanced T category (p < .001), more frequent lymph node metastasis (p = .009), and a higher nuclear and histologic grade (p < .001). Microscopically, signet ring cells were frequently observed in HER2-positive PMC (p < .001), whereas a micropapillary pattern was more frequent in HER2-negative PMC (p = .012). HER2-positive PMC was more frequently negative for ER (33.3% vs. 1.2%) and PR (28.6% vs. 7.2%) than HER2-negative PMC and showed a high Ki-67 labeling index. During follow-up, distant metastasis and recurrence developed in three HER2-positive PMC patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that only HER2-positivity and lymph node status were significantly associated with DFS.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that HER2-positive PMC is a more aggressive subgroup of PMC. HER2 positivity should be considered for adequate management of PMC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Poor response of HER2-positive mucinous carcinomas of breast to neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy: A study of four cases
    Min Han, Daniel Schmolze, Javier A. Arias-Stella, Christina H. Wei, Joanne Mortimer, Fang Fan
    Annals of Diagnostic Pathology.2025; 74: 152396.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mesonephric Marker Expression in Low-grade Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma
    Yurimi Lee, Sangjoon Choi, Hyun-Soo Kim
    International Journal of Gynecological Pathology.2024; 43(3): 221.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological characteristics of mucinous breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of a 6-years study from national cancer center in Vietnam
    Thi Huyen Phung, Thanh Tung Pham, Huu Thang Nguyen, Dinh Thach Nguyen, Thanh Long Nguyen, Thi Hoai Hoang
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological features and prognosis of mucinous breast carcinoma with a micropapillary structure
    Beibei Yang, Menglu Shen, Bo Sun, Jing Zhao, Meng Wang
    Thoracic Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pure Mucinous Carcinoma of the Breast: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
    Cherie M Kuzmiak, Benjamin C Calhoun
    Journal of Breast Imaging.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Role of circ-FOXO3 and miR-23a in radiosensitivity of breast cancer
    Elahe Abdollahi, Hossein Mozdarani, Behrooz Z. Alizadeh
    Breast Cancer.2023; 30(5): 714.     CrossRef
  • On Ultrasonographic Features of Mucinous Carcinoma with Micropapillary Pattern
    Wei-Sen Yang, Yang Li, Ya Gao
    Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy.2023; Volume 15: 473.     CrossRef
  • Spectrum of Mucin-containing Lesions of the Breast: Multimodality Imaging Review with Pathologic Correlation
    Janice N. Thai, Melinda F. Lerwill, Shinn-Huey S. Chou
    RadioGraphics.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma of the Ovary: Clinicopathological and Molecular Characteristics
    Hyun Hee Koh, Eunhyang Park, Hyun-Soo Kim
    Diagnostics.2022; 12(2): 326.     CrossRef
  • Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma of the Uterus: Clinicopathological and Molecular Characteristics
    Yurimi Lee, Kiyong Na, Ha Young Woo, Hyun-Soo Kim
    Diagnostics.2022; 12(5): 1102.     CrossRef
  • Metastasis of the Mucionous adenocarcinoma of breast to the mandibular gingiva: Rare case report
    Ivana Mijatov, Aleksandra Fejsa Levakov, Aleksandar Spasić, Jelena Nikolić, Saša Mijatov
    Medicine.2022; 101(38): e30732.     CrossRef
  • Endometrioid Carcinomas of the Ovaries and Endometrium Involving Endocervical Polyps: Comprehensive Clinicopathological Analyses
    Jihee Sohn, Yurimi Lee, Hyun-Soo Kim
    Diagnostics.2022; 12(10): 2339.     CrossRef
  • Serous Carcinoma of the Endometrium with Mesonephric-Like Differentiation Initially Misdiagnosed as Uterine Mesonephric-Like Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report with Emphasis on the Immunostaining and the Identification of Splice Site TP53 Mutation
    Sangjoon Choi, Yoon Yang Jung, Hyun-Soo Kim
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(4): 717.     CrossRef
  • HER2 positive mucinous carcinoma of breast with micropapillary features: Report of a case and review of literature
    Dinesh Chandra Doval, Rupal Tripathi, Sunil Pasricha, Pankaj Goyal, Chaturbhuj Agrawal, Anurag Mehta
    Human Pathology: Case Reports.2021; 25: 200531.     CrossRef
  • Carcinoma mucosecretor de mama HER2-positivo, un caso clínico
    A.M. González Aranda, E. Martínez Gómez, A. Santana Costa, F. Arnanz Velasco, M.H. González de Diego, A. Zapico Goñi
    Clínica e Investigación en Ginecología y Obstetricia.2021; 48(4): 100685.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathologic features of unexpectedly HER2 positive breast carcinomas: An institutional experience
    Carissa LaBoy, Kalliopi P. Siziopikou, Lauren Rosen, Luis Z. Blanco, Jennifer L. Pincus
    Pathology - Research and Practice.2021; 222: 153441.     CrossRef
  • Mesonephric-like Differentiation of Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma: Clinicopathological and Molecular Characteristics Distinct from Those of Uterine Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma
    Sujin Park, Go Eun Bae, Jiyoung Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(8): 1450.     CrossRef
  • Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Corpus: Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Analyses Using Markers for Mesonephric, Endometrioid and Serous Tumors
    Hyunjin Kim, Kiyong Na, Go Eun Bae, Hyun-Soo Kim
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(11): 2042.     CrossRef
Article image
Analysis of the molecular subtypes of preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimens in invasive breast cancer
Ye Sul Jeong, Jun Kang, Jieun Lee, Tae-Kyung Yoo, Sung Hun Kim, Ahwon Lee
J Pathol Transl Med. 2020;54(1):87-94.   Published online November 13, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2019.10.14
  • 6,739 View
  • 203 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
Accurate molecular classification of breast core needle biopsy (CNB) tissue is important for determining neoadjuvant systemic therapies for invasive breast cancer. The researchers aimed to evaluate the concordance rate (CR) of molecular subtypes between CNBs and surgical specimens.
Methods
This study was conducted with invasive breast cancer patients who underwent surgery after CNB at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital between December 2014 and December 2017. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki67 were analyzed using immunohistochemistry. ER and PR were evaluated by Allred score (0–8). HER2 was graded from 0 to +3, and all 2+ cases were reflex tested with silver in situ hybridization. The labeling index of Ki67 was counted by either manual scoring or digital image analysis. Molecular subtypes were classified using the above surrogate markers.
Results
In total, 629 patients were evaluated. The CRs of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 were 96.5% (kappa, 0.883; p<.001), 93.0% (kappa, 0.824; p<.001), 99.7% (kappa, 0.988; p<.001), and 78.7% (kappa, 0.577; p<.001), respectively. Digital image analysis of Ki67 in CNB showed better concordance with Ki67 in surgical specimens (CR, 82.3%; kappa, 0.639 for digital image analysis vs. CR, 76.2%; kappa, 0.534 for manual counting). The CRs of luminal A, luminal B, HER2, and triple negative types were 89.0%, 70.0%, 82.9%, and 77.2%, respectively.
Conclusions
CNB was reasonably accurate for determining ER, PR, HER2, Ki67, and molecular subtypes. Using digital image analysis for Ki67 in CNB produced more accurate molecular classifications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of immunohistochemistry staining conditions on the incidence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer
    Min Chong Kim, Sun Young Kwon, Hye Ra Jung, Young Kyung Bae
    Virchows Archiv.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Study on Intratumoral Heterogeneity of Expression of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 in Carcinoma Breast
    Ragavi Uthayasuriyan, Sheba K Jacob, Saloni Naresh Shah
    Apollo Medicine.2024; 21(1): 51.     CrossRef
  • Concordance of HER2 status between core needle biopsy and surgical resection specimens of breast cancer: an analysis focusing on the HER2-low status
    Sei Na, Milim Kim, Yujun Park, Hyun Jung Kwon, Hee-Chul Shin, Eun-Kyu Kim, Mijung Jang, Sun Mi Kim, So Yeon Park
    Breast Cancer.2024; 31(4): 705.     CrossRef
  • Concordance of immunohistochemistry for predictive and prognostic factors in breast cancer between biopsy and surgical excision: a single-centre experience and review of the literature
    Chiara Rossi, Sara Fraticelli, Marianna Fanizza, Alberta Ferrari, Elisa Ferraris, Alessia Messina, Angelica Della Valle, Chiara Annunziata Pasqualina Anghelone, Angioletta Lasagna, Gianpiero Rizzo, Lorenzo Perrone, Maria Grazia Sommaruga, Giulia Meloni, S
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 198(3): 573.     CrossRef
  • Single-center study on clinicopathological and typical molecular pathologic features of metastatic brain tumor
    Su Hwa Kim, Young Suk Lee, Sung Hak Lee, Yeoun Eun Sung, Ahwon Lee, Jun Kang, Jae-Sung Park, Sin Soo Jeun, Youn Soo Lee
    Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2023; 57(4): 217.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Based on Maximum-Intensity Projection in Young Patients with Marked Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI
    Ga-Eun Park, Bong-Joo Kang, Sung-hun Kim, Na-Young Jung
    Life.2023; 13(8): 1744.     CrossRef
  • Concordance between core needle biopsy and surgical excision specimens for Ki‐67 in breast cancer – a systematic review of the literature
    Jahnavi Kalvala, Ruth M Parks, Andrew R Green, Kwok‐Leung Cheung
    Histopathology.2022; 80(3): 468.     CrossRef
  • İnvaziv Meme Kanserinde Preoperatif Kor İğne Biyopsi ile Postoperatif Cerrahi Spesmenler Arasında ER, PR, HER2 ve Ki67 Açısından Karşılaştırma
    Pınar CELEPLİ, Pelin Seher ÖZTEKİN, Salih CELEPLİ, İrem BİGAT, Sema HÜCÜMENOĞLU
    Akdeniz Medical Journal.2022; : 179.     CrossRef
  • Concordance of breast cancer biomarker testing in core needle biopsy and surgical specimens: A single institution experience
    Jessica A. Slostad, Nicole K. Yun, Aimee E. Schad, Surbhi Warrior, Louis F. Fogg, Ruta Rao
    Cancer Medicine.2022; 11(24): 4954.     CrossRef
  • N-Cadherin Distinguishes Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma from Liver Metastases of Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas
    Tiemo S. Gerber, Benjamin Goeppert, Anne Hausen, Hagen R. Witzel, Fabian Bartsch, Mario Schindeldecker, Lisa-Katharina Gröger, Dirk A. Ridder, Oscar Cahyadi, Irene Esposito, Matthias M. Gaida, Peter Schirmacher, Peter R. Galle, Hauke Lang, Wilfried Roth,
    Cancers.2022; 14(13): 3091.     CrossRef
  • Association of Ki-67 Change Pattern After Core Needle Biopsy and Prognosis in HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer Patients
    Shuai Li, Xiaosong Chen, Kunwei Shen
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • MRI Features for Prediction Malignant Intra-Mammary Lymph Nodes: Correlations with Mammography and Ultrasound
    Meejung Kim, Bong Joo Kang, Ga Eun Park
    Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2022; 26(2): 135.     CrossRef
  • A single centre experience in Turkey for comparison between core needle biopsy and surgical specimen evaluation results for HER2, SISH, estrogen receptors and progesterone receptors in breast cancer patients
    Hatice Karaman, Fatma Senel, Arzu Tasdemir, Ipek Özer, Merve Dogan
    Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2022; 18(6): 1789.     CrossRef
  • Meme kanseri trucut ve rezeksiyon materyallerinde yeni moleküler sınıflama, tanı ve hormon reseptörlerinin durumu tutarlı mı?
    Yeliz ARMAN KARAKAYA, Sevda YILMAZ, Hande KARABAŞ
    Pamukkale Medical Journal.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • What shear wave elastography parameter best differentiates breast cancer and predicts its histologic aggressiveness?
    Hyunjin Kim, Jeongmin Lee, Bong Joo Kang, Sung Hun Kim
    Ultrasonography.2021; 40(2): 265.     CrossRef
  • Risk-based decision-making in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer: Recommendations based on the current state of knowledge
    Christian Jackisch, Patricia Cortazar, Charles E. Geyer, Luca Gianni, Joseph Gligorov, Zuzana Machackova, Edith A. Perez, Andreas Schneeweiss, Sara M. Tolaney, Michael Untch, Andrew Wardley, Martine Piccart
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2021; 99: 102229.     CrossRef
  • Factors influencing agreement of breast cancer luminal molecular subtype by Ki67 labeling index between core needle biopsy and surgical resection specimens
    Kristina A. Tendl-Schulz, Fabian Rössler, Philipp Wimmer, Ulrike M. Heber, Martina Mittlböck, Nicolas Kozakowski, Katja Pinker, Rupert Bartsch, Peter Dubsky, Florian Fitzal, Martin Filipits, Fanny Carolina Eckel, Eva-Maria Langthaler, Günther Steger, Mich
    Virchows Archiv.2020; 477(4): 545.     CrossRef
Review
Article image
HER2 status in breast cancer: changes in guidelines and complicating factors for interpretation
Soomin Ahn, Ji Won Woo, Kyoungyul Lee, So Yeon Park
J Pathol Transl Med. 2020;54(1):34-44.   Published online November 6, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2019.11.03
  • 20,958 View
  • 1,143 Download
  • 137 Web of Science
  • 135 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein overexpression and/or HER2 gene amplification is found in about 20% of invasive breast cancers. It is a sole predictive marker for treatment benefits from HER2 targeted therapy and thus, HER2 testing is a routine practice for newly diagnosed breast cancer in pathology. Currently, HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is used for a screening test, and in situ hybridization is used as a confirmation test for HER2 IHC equivocal cases. Since the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines on HER2 testing was first released in 2007, it has been updated to provide clear instructions for HER2 testing and accurate determination of HER2 status in breast cancer. During HER2 interpretation, some pitfalls such as intratumoral HER2 heterogeneity and increase in chromosome enumeration probe 17 signals may lead to inaccurate assessment of HER2 status. Moreover, HER2 status can be altered after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or during metastatic progression, due to biologic or methodologic issues. This review addresses recent updates of ASCO/CAP guidelines and factors complicating in the interpretation of HER2 status in breast cancers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Identification of novel chemical scaffolds against kinase domain of cancer causing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2: a systemic chemoinformatic approach
    Faris Alrumaihi
    Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics.2024; 42(12): 6269.     CrossRef
  • Standardized pathology report for HER2 testing in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer
    Mariia Ivanova, Francesca Maria Porta, Marianna D’Ercole, Carlo Pescia, Elham Sajjadi, Giulia Cursano, Elisa De Camilli, Oriana Pala, Giovanni Mazzarol, Konstantinos Venetis, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Giuseppe Curigliano, Giuseppe Viale, Nicola Fusco
    Virchows Archiv.2024; 484(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Analytical Performance Evaluation of a 523-Gene Circulating Tumor DNA Assay for Next-Generation Sequencing–Based Comprehensive Tumor Profiling in Liquid Biopsy Samples
    Johannes Harter, Eleonora Buth, Janina Johaenning, Florian Battke, Maria Kopp, Henning Zelba, Martin Schulze, Jiri Koedding, Saskia Biskup
    The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics.2024; 26(1): 61.     CrossRef
  • Are There More HER2 FISH in the Sea? An Institution’s Experience in Identifying HER2 Positivity Using Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization in Patients with HER2 Negative Immunohistochemistry
    Camille Suydam, Fairouz Chibane, Nicole Brown, Madeleine Schlafly, Alicia H. Arnold, Intisar Ghleilib, Melissa Easley, Joseph White
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(1): 376.     CrossRef
  • HER2 copy number determination in breast cancer using the highly sensitive droplet digital PCR method
    Beate Alinger-Scharinger, Cornelia Kronberger, Georg Hutarew, Wolfgang Hitzl, Roland Reitsamer, Klaassen-Federspiel Frederike, Martina Hager, Thorsten Fischer, Karl Sotlar, Heidi Jaksch-Bogensperger
    Virchows Archiv.2024; 485(1): 53.     CrossRef
  • Impact of HER2-low status for patients with early-stage breast cancer and non-pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a National Cancer Database Analysis
    Huiyue Li, Jennifer K. Plichta, Kan Li, Yizi Jin, Samantha M. Thomas, Fei Ma, Li Tang, Qingyi Wei, You-Wen He, Qichen Chen, Yuanyuan Guo, Yueping Liu, Jian Zhang, Sheng Luo
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 204(1): 89.     CrossRef
  • Qualification of a multiplexed tissue imaging assay and detection of novel patterns of HER2 heterogeneity in breast cancer
    Jennifer L. Guerriero, Jia-Ren Lin, Ricardo G. Pastorello, Ziming Du, Yu-An Chen, Madeline G. Townsend, Kenichi Shimada, Melissa E. Hughes, Siyang Ren, Nabihah Tayob, Kelly Zheng, Shaolin Mei, Alyssa Patterson, Krishan L. Taneja, Otto Metzger, Sara M. Tol
    npj Breast Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Utility and Benefits of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Cancer
    Melissa Yuwono Tjota, Jeremy P Segal, Peng Wang
    The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine.2024; 9(1): 76.     CrossRef
  • High contrast breast cancer biomarker semi-quantification and immunohistochemistry imaging using upconverting nanoparticles
    Sanathana Konugolu Venkata Sekar, Hui Ma, Katarzyna Komolibus, Gokhan Dumlupinar, Matthias J. Mickert, Krzysztof Krawczyk, Stefan Andersson-Engels
    Biomedical Optics Express.2024; 15(2): 900.     CrossRef
  • HER2-low breast cancer and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a population-based cohort study
    Ximena Baez-Navarro, Mieke R. van Bockstal, Agnes Jager, Carolien H.M. van Deurzen
    Pathology.2024; 56(3): 334.     CrossRef
  • Fast-tracking drug development with biomarkers and companion diagnostics
    Noreen McBrearty, Devika Bahal, Suso Platero
    Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Emerging Landscape of Targeted Therapy of Breast Cancers With Low Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Protein Expression
    Gary Tozbikian, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Marilyn M. Bui, Michael Feldman, David G. Hicks, Shabnam Jaffer, Thaer Khoury, Shi Wei, Hannah Wen, Paula Pohlmann
    Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.2024; 148(2): 242.     CrossRef
  • Treatment Patterns and Health Outcomes among Patients with HER2 IHC0/-Low Metastatic or Recurrent Breast Cancer
    Eliya Farah, Chantelle Carbonell, Devon J. Boyne, Darren R. Brenner, Jan-Willem Henning, Daniel Moldaver, Simran Shokar, Winson Y. Cheung
    Cancers.2024; 16(3): 518.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Internal Dosimetry and Biodistribution of 177Lu-DOTA-Trastuzumab in HER2-Positive Metastatic and Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma
    Yoga S. Narwadkar, Rahul V. Parghane, Sudeep Sahu, Sangita Lad, Kamal Deep, Gaurav Wanage, Tejal Suralkar, Sharmila Banerjee, Sudeep Gupta, Sandip Basu, Rajendra A. Badwe
    Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2024; 49(4): e149.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Classifications in Gastric Cancer: A Call for Interdisciplinary Collaboration
    Cristina Díaz del Arco, María Jesús Fernández Aceñero, Luis Ortega Medina
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(5): 2649.     CrossRef
  • The combined immunohistochemical expression of AMBRA1 and SQSTM1 identifies patients with poorly differentiated cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma at risk of metastasis: A proof of concept study
    Michael H. Alexander, William J. Cousins, Tom Ewen, Andrew P. South, Penny Lovat, Niki Stefanos
    Journal of Cutaneous Pathology.2024; 51(6): 450.     CrossRef
  • Concordance between pathologists and between specimen types in detection of HER2-low breast carcinoma by immunohistochemistry
    Jing Wang, Esther Yoon, Savitri Krishnamurthy
    Annals of Diagnostic Pathology.2024; 70: 152288.     CrossRef
  • Detection of HER2 expression using 99mTc-NM-02 nanobody in patients with breast cancer: a non-randomized, non-blinded clinical trial
    Lingzhou Zhao, Yan Xing, Changcun Liu, Shaofei Ma, Wenhua Huang, Zhen Cheng, Jinhua Zhao
    Breast Cancer Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pyrotinib and Trastuzumab Plus Chemotherapy Serve as an Acceptable Neoadjuvant Regimen Exhibiting Good Efficacy and Tolerance in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients
    Yibo Chen, Tianyi Zhang, Rui Zhang, Xuchen Cao
    Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals.2024; 39(6): 435.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of VEGF, PDGF-B, and HER2/neu expression in gallbladder cancer
    Pooja Shukla, Kumudesh Mishra, Ratnakar Shukla, Ruchira Vishwakarma, Niraj Kumari, Narendra Krishnani, Anu Behari, Vinay K. Kapoor
    Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2024; 20(1): 349.     CrossRef
  • Open questions, current challenges, and future perspectives in targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low breast cancer
    G. Curigliano, R. Dent, H. Earle, S. Modi, P. Tarantino, G. Viale, S.M. Tolaney
    ESMO Open.2024; 9(4): 102989.     CrossRef
  • Concordance of HER2 status between core needle biopsy and surgical resection specimens of breast cancer: an analysis focusing on the HER2-low status
    Sei Na, Milim Kim, Yujun Park, Hyun Jung Kwon, Hee-Chul Shin, Eun-Kyu Kim, Mijung Jang, Sun Mi Kim, So Yeon Park
    Breast Cancer.2024; 31(4): 705.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) on Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer
    Suji Lee, Jee Yeon Kim, So Jeong Lee, Chung Su Hwang, Hyun Jung Lee, Kyung Bin Kim, Jung Hee Lee, Dong Hoon Shin, Kyung Un Choi, Chang Hun Lee, Gi Yeong Huh, Ahrong Kim
    Medicina.2024; 60(5): 737.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Use of Molecular Biomarkers in Canine and Feline Oncology: Current and Future
    Heike Aupperle-Lellbach, Alexandra Kehl, Simone de Brot, Louise van der Weyden
    Veterinary Sciences.2024; 11(5): 199.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Validation of Artificial Intelligence–Powered PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score Interpretation for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response Prediction in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Hyojin Kim, Seokhwi Kim, Sangjoon Choi, Changhee Park, Seonwook Park, Sergio Pereira, Minuk Ma, Donggeun Yoo, Kyunghyun Paeng, Wonkyung Jung, Sehhoon Park, Chan-Young Ock, Se-Hoon Lee, Yoon-La Choi, Jin-Haeng Chung
    JCO Precision Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor amplification correlates with adverse pathological features and poor clinical outcome in colorectal cancer
    Qiu-Xiao Yu, Ping-Ying Fu, Chi Zhang, Li Li, Wen-Ting Huang
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(5): 1395.     CrossRef
  • Lipid nanoparticles-based RNA therapies for breast cancer treatment
    Luigia Serpico, Yuewen Zhu, Renata Faria Maia, Sumedha Sumedha, Mohammad-Ali Shahbazi, Hélder A. Santos
    Drug Delivery and Translational Research.2024; 14(10): 2823.     CrossRef
  • Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer: practice points and challenges
    Natthawadee Laokulrath, Mihir Gudi, Syed Ahmed Salahuddin, Angela Phek Yoon Chong, Cristine Ding, Jabed Iqbal, Wei Qiang Leow, Benjamin Yongcheng Tan, Gary Tse, Emad Rakha, Puay Hoon Tan
    Histopathology.2024; 85(3): 371.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Analysis of Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition Biomarkers in the Invasive Micropapillary Cancer of the Breast
    Ozden Oz, Funda Alkan Tasli, Resmiye Irmak Yuzuguldu, Baha Zengel, Demet Kocatepe Cavdar, Merih Guray Durak, Raika Durusoy, Pranshu Sahgal
    International Journal of Breast Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advancing HER2-low breast cancer management: enhancing diagnosis and treatment strategies
    Simona Borstnar, Ivana Bozovic-Spasojevic, Ana Cvetanovic, Natalija Dedic Plavetic, Assia Konsoulova, Erika Matos, Lazar Popovic, Savelina Popovska, Snjezana Tomic, Eduard Vrdoljak
    Radiology and Oncology.2024; 58(2): 258.     CrossRef
  • Peer‐to‐peer validation of Ki‐67 scoring in a pathology quality circle as a tool to assess interobserver variability: are we better than we thought?
    Marit Bernhardt, Leonie Weinhold, Christine Sanders, Oliver Hommerding, Jan‐Frederic Lau, Marieta Toma, Verena Tischler, Matthias Schmid, Tomasz Zienkiewicz, Ralf Hildenbrand, Peter Gerlach, Hui Zhou, Martin Braun, Gunnar Müller, Erich Sieber, Christian M
    APMIS.2024; 132(10): 718.     CrossRef
  • Immunohistochemical Expression of Cyclin D1 and p16 in Invasive Breast Carcinoma and Its Association with Clinicopathological Parameters
    Shaivy Malik, Shakthivel V., Sana Ahuja, Charanjeet Ahluwalia
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; 15(4): 864.     CrossRef
  • Novel engineered HER2 specific recombinant protein nanocages for targeted drug delivery
    Javad Kheshti, Mohammad Ahmadyousefi, Meysam Soleimani
    Molecular Biology Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Circulating C-reactive protein levels as a prognostic biomarker in breast cancer across body mass index groups
    J. B. Holm, E. Baggesen, D. Cronin-Fenton, J. Frystyk, J. M. Bruun, P. Christiansen, S. Borgquist
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Standardized molecular pathology workflow for ctDNA-based ESR1 testing in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer
    Elena Guerini-Rocco, Konstantinos Venetis, Giulia Cursano, Eltjona Mane, Chiara Frascarelli, Francesco Pepe, Mariachiara Negrelli, Edoardo Olmeda, Davide Vacirca, Alberto Ranghiero, Dario Trapani, Carmen Criscitiello, Giuseppe Curigliano, Christian Rolfo,
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2024; 201: 104427.     CrossRef
  • The differences between pure and mixed invasive micropapillary breast cancer: the epithelial–mesenchymal transition molecules and prognosis
    Ozden Oz, Resmiye Irmak Yuzuguldu, Ayse Yazici, Demet Kocatepe Cavdar, Cengiz Yilmaz, Mucteba Ozturk, Hilal Duzel, Duygu Gurel
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 208(1): 41.     CrossRef
  • Best practices for achieving consensus in HER2‐low expression in breast cancer: current perspectives from practising pathologists
    Gary Tozbikian, Marilyn M. Bui, David G Hicks, Shabnam Jaffer, Thaer Khoury, Hannah Y Wen, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Shi Wei
    Histopathology.2024; 85(3): 489.     CrossRef
  • Consensus Guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Low Testing in Breast Cancer in Malaysia
    Pathmanathan Rajadurai, Sarala Ravindran, Bang Rom Lee, Suria Hayati Md Pauzi, Seow Fan Chiew, Kean Hooi Teoh, Navarasi S. Raja Gopal, Mastura Md Yusof, Cheng Har Yip
    Cancers.2024; 16(13): 2325.     CrossRef
  • Revolutionizing Pathology with Artificial Intelligence: Innovations in Immunohistochemistry
    Diana Gina Poalelungi, Anca Iulia Neagu, Ana Fulga, Marius Neagu, Dana Tutunaru, Aurel Nechita, Iuliu Fulga
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2024; 14(7): 693.     CrossRef
  • A Comprehensive Model Outperformed the Single Radiomics Model in Noninvasively Predicting the HER2 Status in Patients with Breast Cancer
    Weimin Liu, Yiqing Yang, Xiaohong Wang, Chao Li, Chen Liu, Xiaolei Li, Junzhe Wen, Xue Lin, Jie Qin
    Academic Radiology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Interobserver Variability in HER‐2 Immunostaining Interpretation of Metastatic HER2 Low Breast Cancers in Cytology Specimens
    Niyati Desai, Courtney F. Connelly, Simon Sung, Adela Cimic, Swikrity U. Baskota
    Diagnostic Cytopathology.2024; 52(12): 722.     CrossRef
  • Weakly-supervised deep learning models enable HER2-low prediction from H &E stained slides
    Renan Valieris, Luan Martins, Alexandre Defelicibus, Adriana Passos Bueno, Cynthia Aparecida Bueno de Toledo Osorio, Dirce Carraro, Emmanuel Dias-Neto, Rafael A. Rosales, Jose Marcio Barros de Figueiredo, Israel Tojal da Silva
    Breast Cancer Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Understanding the spectrum of HER2 status in breast cancer: From HER2-positive to ultra-low HER2
    Sana Ahuja, Adil Aziz Khan, Sufian Zaheer
    Pathology - Research and Practice.2024; 262: 155550.     CrossRef
  • Systematic review of added immunotherapy in traditional treatment for HER2 positive breast cancer patients
    Rohan Choudhari
    Innovative Practice in Breast Health.2024; 3-4: 100013.     CrossRef
  • Detecting early-stage breast cancer with GATA3-positive circulating tumor cells
    Chun-Hsin Hsieh, Ya-Herng Chang, Pei-Ying Ling, Ying-Tai Jin, Pei-Hsuan Lo, Hei-Jen Jou
    Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2024; 63(5): 745.     CrossRef
  • First-in-human study of DP303c, a HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate in patients with HER2 positive solid tumors
    Jian Zhang, Yiqun Du, Yanchun Meng, Xiaojun Liu, Yuxin Mu, Yunpeng Liu, Yehui Shi, Jufeng Wang, Aimin Zang, Shanzhi Gu, Tianshu Liu, Huan Zhou, Hongqian Guo, Silong Xiang, Xialu Zhang, Suqiong Wu, Huanhuan Qi, Mengke Li, Xichun Hu
    npj Precision Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Targeting CD276 for T cell-based immunotherapy of breast cancer
    Ilona Hagelstein, Laura Wessling, Alexander Rochwarger, Latifa Zekri, Boris Klimovich, Christian M. Tegeler, Gundram Jung, Christian M. Schürch, Helmut R. Salih, Martina S. Lutz
    Journal of Translational Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Correlation of Androgen Receptor Expression With Ki67 Proliferative Index and Other Clinicopathological Characteristics in Invasive Mammary Carcinomas
    D Keerthana Devi, V Pavithra, Leena D Joseph, Chithra Bhanu Challa
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • CD81-guided heterologous EVs present heterogeneous interactions with breast cancer cells
    Elena Gurrieri, Giulia Carradori, Michela Roccuzzo, Michael Pancher, Daniele Peroni, Romina Belli, Caterina Trevisan, Michela Notarangelo, Wen-Qiu Huang, Agata S. A. Carreira, Alessandro Quattrone, Guido Jenster, Timo L. M. Ten Hagen, Vito Giuseppe D’Agos
    Journal of Biomedical Science.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multiparametric MRI Radiomics With Machine Learning for Differentiating HER2-Zero, -Low, and -Positive Breast Cancer: Model Development, Testing, and Interpretability Analysis
    Yongxin Chen, Siyi Chen, Wenjie Tang, Qingcong Konge, Zhidan Zhong, Xiaomeng Yu, Yi Sui, Wenke Hu, Xinqing Jiang, Yuan Guo
    American Journal of Roentgenology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Deciphering HER2-low breast cancer (BC): insights from real-world data in early stage breast cancer
    Anna Pous, Adrià Bernat-Peguera, Assumpció López-Paradís, Beatriz Cirauqui, Vanesa Quiroga, Iris Teruel, Eudald Felip, Angelica Ferrando-Díez, Milana Bergamino, Laia Boronat, Margarita Romeo, Gemma Soler, Christian Mariño, Paula Rodríguez-Martínez, Laura
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Liquid biopsy-based technologies: a promising tool for biomarker identification in her2-low breast cancer patients for improved therapeutic outcomes
    Aldo D’Alessandro, Anca Florentina Deaconu, Sandro Mandolesi, Federico Pio Fabrizio, Massimo Lombardi, Giovanna Liguori, Giovanni Pepe, Nicola Marino, Aureliano Stingi, Alessandro D’Alessandro, Antonio Giordano
    Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis of Unknown Origin and Remote Primary at a Tertiary Cancer Centre in North India: Case Series with Review of Literature
    Kriti Grover, Siddharth Arora, Mansi Dey, Deepti Awasthi, Harshad Sharma, Bibhu Prasad Mishra, Nitesh Mohan, Cheena Garg, Arjun Agarwal
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical Management of the Axilla in HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer in the Z1071 Era: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the National Cancer Database
    Vayda R. Barker, Samer A. Naffouje, Melissa A. Mallory, Susan A. Hoover, Christine Laronga
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(13): 8371.     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive identification of HER2-low-positive status by MRI-based deep learning radiomics predicts the disease-free survival of patients with breast cancer
    Yuan Guo, Xiaotong Xie, Wenjie Tang, Siyi Chen, Mingyu Wang, Yaheng Fan, Chuxuan Lin, Wenke Hu, Jing Yang, Jialin Xiang, Kuiming Jiang, Xinhua Wei, Bingsheng Huang, Xinqing Jiang
    European Radiology.2023; 34(2): 899.     CrossRef
  • Systemic investigation of inetetamab in combination with small molecules to treat HER2-overexpressing breast and gastric cancers
    Lan Deng, Le Zhao, Lifen Liu, Haomin Huang
    Open Life Sciences.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • HER2-low expression in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors
    B. Uzunparmak, C. Haymaker, G. Raso, S. Masciari, L. Wang, H. Lin, A. Gorur, B. Kirby, A.-M. Cimo, A. Kennon, Q. Ding, G. Urschel, Y. Yuan, G. Feng, Y. Rizvi, A. Hussain, C. Zhu, P. Kim, G. Abbadessa, V. Subbiah, T.A. Yap, J. Rodon, S.A. Piha-Paul, F. Mer
    Annals of Oncology.2023; 34(11): 1035.     CrossRef
  • Data on 2D culture characterisation of potential markers in human HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines
    Son H. Pham, Lyn R. Griffiths, Rachel K. Okolicsanyi, Larisa M. Haupt
    Data in Brief.2023; 46: 108880.     CrossRef
  • Determining HER2 Status by Artificial Intelligence: An Investigation of Primary, Metastatic, and HER2 Low Breast Tumors
    Christiane Palm, Catherine E. Connolly, Regina Masser, Barbara Padberg Sgier, Eva Karamitopoulou, Quentin Simon, Beata Bode, Marianne Tinguely
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(1): 168.     CrossRef
  • Gene amplification mutations originate prior to selective stress in Acinetobacter baylyi
    Jennifer A Herrmann, Agata Koprowska, Tesa J Winters, Nancy Villanueva, Victoria D Nikityuk, Feini Pek, Elizabeth M Reis, Constancia Z Dominguez, Daniel Davis, Eric McPherson, Staci R Rocco, Cynthia Recendez, Shyla M Difuntorum, Kelly Faeth, Mario D Lopez
    G3.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Flow Rate-Independent Multiscale Liquid Biopsy for Precision Oncology
    Jie Wang, Robert Dallmann, Renquan Lu, Jing Yan, Jérôme Charmet
    ACS Sensors.2023; 8(3): 1200.     CrossRef
  • Single-cell HER2 quantification via instant signal amplification in microdroplets
    Xiaoxian Liu, Yifan Zhu, Caoxin Li, Yanyun Fang, Jinna Chen, Fei Xu, Yanqing Lu, Perry Ping Shum, Ying Liu, Guanghui Wang
    Analytica Chimica Acta.2023; 1251: 340976.     CrossRef
  • Molecular imaging of HER2 receptor: Targeting HER2 for imaging and therapy in nuclear medicine
    Daniela Miladinova
    Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • CORRELATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL PARAMETERS AND MOLECULAR SUBTYPES OF FEMALE BREAST CARCINOMA IN SOUTH REGION OF IRAQ
    Yassir Alaa Muhammed Hassan Shubbar
    Wiadomości Lekarskie.2023; 76(1): 97.     CrossRef
  • Pathological identification of HER2-low breast cancer: Tips, tricks, and troubleshooting for the optimal test
    Elham Sajjadi, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Elisa De Camilli, Oriana Pala, Giovanni Mazzarol, Konstantinos Venetis, Mariia Ivanova, Nicola Fusco
    Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Protective Effect of HER2 Gene Polymorphism rs24537331 in the Outcome of Canine Mammary Tumors
    Ana Canadas-Sousa, Marta Santos, Patrícia Dias-Pereira
    Animals.2023; 13(8): 1384.     CrossRef
  • Can Patients with HER2-Low Breast Cancer Benefit from Anti-HER2 Therapies? A Review
    Jin Wang, Dongying Liao, Xuemin Zhang, Changhong Miao, Kuang Chen
    Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy.2023; Volume 15: 281.     CrossRef
  • HER2 Low Breast Cancer: A New Subtype or a Trojan for Cytotoxic Drug Delivery?
    Marina Popović, Tajana Silovski, Marija Križić, Natalija Dedić Plavetić
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(9): 8206.     CrossRef
  • HER2-Low Breast Cancer—Diagnostic Challenges and Opportunities for Insights from Ongoing Studies: A Podcast
    Aditya Bardia, Giuseppe Viale
    Targeted Oncology.2023; 18(3): 313.     CrossRef
  • Histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of predictive and prognostic markers in spontaneous canine mammary cancer
    Vladimír Tancoš, Marcel Kovalik, Martin Levkut, Martina Bobrovská, Petra Kolenčíková, Ľubomír Straka, Zuzana Ševčíková, Ondřej Škor, Martina Antošová, Lukáš Plank, Keith L. Thoday
    Acta Veterinaria Brno.2023; 92(2): 143.     CrossRef
  • Dissecting sources of variability in patient response to targeted therapy: anti-HER2 therapies as a case study
    Timothy Qi, Yanguang Cao
    European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.2023; 186: 106467.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of HER2-Low Status on Pathological Complete Response and Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yakup Ergun, Baran Akagunduz, Cengiz Karacin, Sema Turker, Gokhan Ucar
    Clinical Breast Cancer.2023; 23(6): 567.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy, toxicity and prognostic factors of pyrotinib‑involved neoadjuvant therapy in HER2‑positive breast cancer: A retrospective study
    Hao Wang, Hailing Cao, Zhiyun Guo
    Oncology Letters.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advancements in clinical aspects of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in breast cancer
    Feng Ye, Saikat Dewanjee, Yuehua Li, Niraj Kumar Jha, Zhe-Sheng Chen, Ankush Kumar, Vishakha, Tapan Behl, Saurabh Kumar Jha, Hailin Tang
    Molecular Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Weakly supervised bilayer convolutional network in segmentation of HER2 related cells to guide HER2 targeted therapies
    Ching-Wei Wang, Kun-Lin Lin, Hikam Muzakky, Yi-Jia Lin, Tai-Kuang Chao
    Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics.2023; 108: 102270.     CrossRef
  • Immune Biomarkers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Improving the Predictivity of Current Testing Methods
    Francesca Maria Porta, Elham Sajjadi, Konstantinos Venetis, Chiara Frascarelli, Giulia Cursano, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Nicola Fusco, Mariia Ivanova
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2023; 13(7): 1176.     CrossRef
  • HER2 Equivocal (Score = 2+) Breast Carcinoma Cases Identified by Immunohistochemistry at a South African Hospital. What is the Impact of Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Testing?
    Reena Dhansukh Mohanlal, Nikki Bouwer, Pascale Willem
    Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology.2023; 31(8): 555.     CrossRef
  • Discordance of HER2 Expression and/or Amplification on Repeat Testing
    Timothy P. DiPeri, Kathleen Kong, Kaushik Varadarajan, Daniel D. Karp, Jaffer A. Ajani, Shubham Pant, Michael F. Press, Sarina A. Piha-Paul, Ecaterina E. Dumbrava, Funda Meric-Bernstam
    Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.2023; 22(8): 976.     CrossRef
  • Low and Ultra-Low HER2 in Human Breast Cancer: An Effort to Define New Neoplastic Subtypes
    Mariausilia Franchina, Cristina Pizzimenti, Vincenzo Fiorentino, Maurizio Martini, Giuseppina Rosaria Rita Ricciardi, Nicola Silvestris, Antonio Ieni, Giovanni Tuccari
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(16): 12795.     CrossRef
  • Genetic analysis of oligo-recurrence breast cancer: correlation with clinical outcomes
    Kuikui Jiang, Danyang Zhou, Fei Xu, Wen Xia, Qiufan Zheng, Qianyi Lu, Rongzhen Luo, Ruoxi Hong, Shusen Wang
    BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Single domain antibodies specific for HER2 dimerization domain effectively disrupts HER2 dimerization
    Ahmad Najafi, Reza Valadan, Hossein Asgarian-Omran, Alireza Rafiei, Mohsen Tehrani
    International Immunopharmacology.2023; 124: 110999.     CrossRef
  • Récepteur du facteur de croissance épidermique HER2, tests utilisés pour rechercher son amplification dans le cancer du sein : principes et limites
    Imane Eliahiai, Mohammed Eljiar, Sanae Chaib, Jinane KHarmoum, Mariame Chraïbi
    Bulletin du Cancer.2023; 110(12): 1301.     CrossRef
  • Integrated Molecular Characterization of HER2-Low Breast Cancer Using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)
    Jean-Louis Merlin, Marie Husson, Nassim Sahki, Pauline Gilson, Vincent Massard, Alexandre Harlé, Agnès Leroux
    Biomedicines.2023; 11(12): 3164.     CrossRef
  • GLUCOSE LEVELS OF PLEURAL EFFUSION FLUID AND HER2 STATUS IN PLEURAL-METASTATIC BREAST CANCER
    Muhammad Dhanny Irawan, Desak Gede Agung Suprabawati, Heru Purwanto
    Majalah Biomorfologi.2023; 33(2): 75.     CrossRef
  • Design of a Ratiometric Plasmonic Biosensor for Herceptin Detection in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
    Neda Shahbazi, Rouholah Zare-Dorabei, Seyed Morteza Naghib
    ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering.2022; 8(2): 871.     CrossRef
  • A highly sensitive nanobiosensor based on aptamer-conjugated graphene-decorated rhodium nanoparticles for detection of HER2-positive circulating tumor cells
    Mahdi Sadeghi, Soheila Kashanian, Seyed Morteza Naghib, Esfandyar Askari, Fateme Haghiralsadat, Davood Tofighi
    Nanotechnology Reviews.2022; 11(1): 793.     CrossRef
  • Anti-HER2 therapy in metastatic breast cancer: many choices and future directions
    Carrie S. Wynn, Shou-Ching Tang
    Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.2022; 41(1): 193.     CrossRef
  • Electroanalytical overview: screen-printed electrochemical sensing platforms for the detection of vital cardiac, cancer and inflammatory biomarkers
    Robert D. Crapnell, Alejandro Garcia-Miranda Ferrari, Nina C. Dempsey, Craig E. Banks
    Sensors & Diagnostics.2022; 1(3): 405.     CrossRef
  • FTO genotype was associated with breast cancer in HER2 negative patients
    Fateme Montazeri, Hossein Hatami, Soroor Fathi, Naeemeh Hasanpour Ardekanizadeh, Fatemeh Bourbour, Samira Rastgoo, Fatemeh Shafiee, Mohammad Esmail Akbari, Maryam Gholamalizadeh, Seyed Alireza Mosavi Jarrahi, Saeid Doaei
    Clinical Nutrition ESPEN.2022; 49: 495.     CrossRef
  • Breast Cancer Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 mRNA Molecular Testing Compared to Immunohistochemistry with Correlation to Neoadjuvant Therapy Response
    Mahmoud Behairy, Samia Mohamed Gabal, Mohamed Sherif Negm
    Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences.2022; 10(A): 352.     CrossRef
  • Validity and utility of HER2/ERBB2 copy number variation assessed in liquid biopsies from breast cancer patients: A systematic review
    Noortje Verschoor, Teoman Deger, Agnes Jager, Stefan Sleijfer, Saskia M. Wilting, John W.M. Martens
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2022; 106: 102384.     CrossRef
  • RETRACTED: Longitude Variation of the microRNA-497/FGF-23 Axis during Treatment and Its Linkage with Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Trastuzumab-Induced Cardiotoxicity in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients
    Hui Liu, Xiaoyan Hu, Lingyun Wang, Tao Du, Jing Feng, Ming Li, Lei Liu, Xiaofang Liu
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Use of Radionuclide-Based Imaging Methods in Breast Cancer
    Betül Altunay, Agnieszka Morgenroth, Felix M. Mottaghy
    Seminars in Nuclear Medicine.2022; 52(5): 561.     CrossRef
  • Functional regulations between genetic alteration-driven genes and drug target genes acting as prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer
    Li Wang, Lei Yu, Jian Shi, Feng Li, Caiyu Zhang, Haotian Xu, Xiangzhe Yin, Lixia Wang, Shihua Lin, Anastasiia Litvinova, Yanyan Ping, Shangwei Ning, Hongying Zhao
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 and endocrine resistance in hormone-dependent breast cancer
    Anastasia Alataki, Mitch Dowsett
    Endocrine-Related Cancer.2022; 29(8): R105.     CrossRef
  • The Evolution of Targeted Radionuclide Diagnosis of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
    Olga D. Bragina, Sergei M. Deyev, Vladimir I. Chernov, Vladimir M. Tolmachev
    Acta Naturae.2022; 14(2): 4.     CrossRef
  • Deriving tumor purity from cancer next generation sequencing data: applications for quantitative ERBB2 (HER2) copy number analysis and germline inference of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations
    Stephanie E. Siegmund, Danielle K. Manning, Phani K. Davineni, Fei Dong
    Modern Pathology.2022; 35(10): 1458.     CrossRef
  • Current challenges and unmet needs in treating patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer
    Matti Aapro, Fatima Cardoso, Giuseppe Curigliano, Alexandru Eniu, Joseph Gligorov, Nadia Harbeck, Andreas Mueller, Olivia Pagani, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Elzbieta Senkus, Beat Thürlimann, Khalil Zaman
    The Breast.2022; 66: 145.     CrossRef
  • [Retracted] Application of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assisted by Fluorescence Microscope in Detection of Her2 Gene in Breast Cancer Patients
    Fang Lu, Tingting Zhou, Yan Liu, Liying Song, Bin Zhang, Yuyan Li, Sorayouth Chumnanvej
    Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • High sensitivity label-free detection of HER2 using an Al–GaN/GaN high electron mobility transistor-based biosensor
    Shivanshu Mishra, Pharyanshu Kachhawa, Amber Kumar Jain, Rajiv Ranjan Thakur, Nidhi Chaturvedi
    Lab on a Chip.2022; 22(21): 4129.     CrossRef
  • Indian Data on HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Invasive Breast Cancer with Immunohistochemically Equivocal Results As Per 2018 ASCO/CAP Guidelines
    B. R. Nagarjun, Biren Parikh, Manaswi Nareshkumar Patel, Pina J. Trivedi, Dharmesh M. Patel
    South Asian Journal of Cancer.2022; 11(04): 281.     CrossRef
  • S‑phase fraction, lymph node status and disease staging as the main prognostic factors to differentiate between young and older patients with invasive breast carcinoma
    António Pinto, João Matos, Teresa Pereira, Giovani Silva, Saudade André
    Oncology Letters.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Inferring tumor-specific cancer dependencies through integrating ex vivo drug response assays and drug-protein profiling
    Alina Batzilla, Junyan Lu, Jarno Kivioja, Kerstin Putzker, Joe Lewis, Thorsten Zenz, Wolfgang Huber, James Gallo
    PLOS Computational Biology.2022; 18(8): e1010438.     CrossRef
  • Clinical possibilities of HER2-positive breast cancer diagnosis using alternative scaffold proteins
    O. D. Bragina, V. I. Chernov, S. M. Deyev, V. M. Tolmachev
    Bulletin of Siberian Medicine.2022; 21(3): 132.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Pathology of Gastric Cancer
    Moonsik Kim, An Na Seo
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2022; 22(4): 264.     CrossRef
  • Loss of NECTIN1 triggers melanoma dissemination upon local IGF1 depletion
    Julien Ablain, Amira Al Mahi, Harriet Rothschild, Meera Prasad, Sophie Aires, Song Yang, Maxim E. Dokukin, Shuyun Xu, Michelle Dang, Igor Sokolov, Christine G. Lian, Leonard I. Zon
    Nature Genetics.2022; 54(12): 1839.     CrossRef
  • Advanced diagnosis technologies for HER2 breast cancer markers
    Mengxue Zhang
    Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology.2022; 14: 44.     CrossRef
  • An Overview of Clinical Development of Agents for Metastatic or Advanced Breast Cancer Without ERBB2 Amplification (HER2-Low)
    Aleix Prat, Aditya Bardia, Giuseppe Curigliano, M. Elizabeth H. Hammond, Sibylle Loibl, Sara M. Tolaney, Giuseppe Viale
    JAMA Oncology.2022; 8(11): 1676.     CrossRef
  • Development of T-cell engagers selective for cells co-expressing two antigens
    Danielle M. Dicara, Sunil Bhakta, Mary Ann Go, James Ziai, Ron Firestein, Bill Forrest, Chen Gu, Steven R. Leong, Genee Lee, Shang-Fan Yu, Andrew G. Polson, Nicholas J. Agard
    mAbs.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The clinical significance of HER2 expression in DCIS
    Ioanna Akrida, Francesk Mulita
    Medical Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer: Spotlight on HER2
    Rachel Occhiogrosso Abelman, Arielle Medford, Laura Spring, Aditya Bardia
    The Cancer Journal.2022; 28(6): 423.     CrossRef
  • The Clinical Utility of Droplet Digital PCR for Profiling Circulating Tumor DNA in Breast Cancer Patients
    Ugur Gezer, Abel J. Bronkhorst, Stefan Holdenrieder
    Diagnostics.2022; 12(12): 3042.     CrossRef
  • Lapatinib and lapatinib plus trastuzumab therapy versus trastuzumab therapy for HER2 positive breast cancer patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ye Yuan, Xumei Liu, Yi Cai, Wenyuan Li
    Systematic Reviews.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Interactions dietary components with expression level of breast cancer-related genes
    Fatemeh Bourbour, Azam Pourtaheri, Khadijeh Abbasi, Naeemeh Hasanpour Ardekanizadeh, Maryam Gholamalizadeh, Azadeh Hajipour, Sepideh Abdollahi, Seyedeh Elaheh Bagheri, Mina Ahmadzadeh, Saeid Doaei, Arezoo Haghighian
    Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • HER2-directed antibodies, affibodies and nanobodies as drug-delivery vehicles in breast cancer with a specific focus on radioimmunotherapy and radioimmunoimaging
    Betül Altunay, Agnieszka Morgenroth, Mohsen Beheshti, Andreas Vogg, Nicholas C. L. Wong, Hong Hoi Ting, Hans-Jürgen Biersack, Elmar Stickeler, Felix M. Mottaghy
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.2021; 48(5): 1371.     CrossRef
  • Risk-based decision-making in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer: Recommendations based on the current state of knowledge
    Christian Jackisch, Patricia Cortazar, Charles E. Geyer, Luca Gianni, Joseph Gligorov, Zuzana Machackova, Edith A. Perez, Andreas Schneeweiss, Sara M. Tolaney, Michael Untch, Andrew Wardley, Martine Piccart
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2021; 99: 102229.     CrossRef
  • Histologic Patterns of Cutaneous Metastases of Breast Carcinoma: A Clinicopathologic Study of 232 Cases
    Shira Ronen, David Suster, Wei-Shen Chen, Natali Ronen, Sri Krishna C. Arudra, Celestine Trinidad, Doina Ivan, Victor G. Prieto, Saul Suster
    The American Journal of Dermatopathology.2021; 43(6): 401.     CrossRef
  • Standardized pathology report for breast cancer
    Soo Youn Cho, So Yeon Park, Young Kyung Bae, Jee Yeon Kim, Eun Kyung Kim, Woo Gyeong Kim, Youngmee Kwon, Ahwon Lee, Hee Jin Lee, Ji Shin Lee, Jee Young Park, Gyungyub Gong, Hye Kyoung Yoon
    Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2021; 55(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • The impact of oral contraceptive use on breast cancer risk: State of the art and future perspectives in the era of 4P medicine
    R. Bonfiglio, M.L. Di Pietro
    Seminars in Cancer Biology.2021; 72: 11.     CrossRef
  • The Co-Expression of Melanoma-Antigen Family a Proteins and New York Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-1 in Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study
    Yu-Xin Wang, Feng-Lian Li, Li-Xin Du, Jun-Fang Liu, Li-Gang Huo, Shu-Qing Li, Bin Tian
    Cancer Management and Research.2021; Volume 13: 6123.     CrossRef
  • Targeting HER2 protein in individual cells using ICP-MS detection and its potential as prognostic and predictive breast cancer biomarker
    A. Fernández Asensio, M. Corte-Rodríguez, J. Bettmer, L.M. Sierra, M. Montes-Bayón, E. Blanco- González
    Talanta.2021; 235: 122773.     CrossRef
  • Development of a 99mTc-Labeled Single-Domain Antibody for SPECT/CT Assessment of HER2 Expression in Breast Cancer
    Lingzhou Zhao, Changcun Liu, Yan Xing, Jin He, Jim O’Doherty, Wenhua Huang, Jinhua Zhao
    Molecular Pharmaceutics.2021; 18(9): 3616.     CrossRef
  • WITHDRAWN: Nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques dans les cancers du sein HER2-surexprimé
    Benoîte Mery, Philippe Toussaint, Pierre-Etienne Heudel, Armelle Dufresne, Mélodie Carbonnaux, Hélène Vanacker, Thomas Bachelot, Olivier Trédan
    Bulletin du Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Retrospective observational study of HER2 immunohistochemistry in borderline breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, with an emphasis on Group 2 (HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥2.0, HER2 copy number <4.0 signals/cell) cases
    Emad A. Rakha, Islam M. Miligy, Cecily M. Quinn, Elena Provenzano, Abeer M. Shaaban, Caterina Marchiò, Michael S. Toss, Grace Gallagy, Ciara Murray, Janice Walshe, Ayaka Katayama, Karim Eldib, Nahla Badr, Bruce Tanchel, Rebecca Millican-Slater, Colin Purd
    British Journal of Cancer.2021; 124(11): 1836.     CrossRef
  • Loss of HER2‐positivity following neoadjuvant targeted therapy for breast cancer is not associated with inferior oncologic outcomes
    Catherine L. Wetzel, Thomas L. Sutton, Stuart Gardiner, Maryam Farinola, Nathalie Johnson, Jennifer R. Garreau
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021; 124(8): 1224.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Genetic Predictive Models for the Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Optimize the Effectiveness for Trastuzumab Based Chemotherapy
    Lun Li, Min Chen, Shuyue Zheng, Hanlu Li, Weiru Chi, Bingqiu Xiu, Qi Zhang, Jianjing Hou, Jia Wang, Jiong Wu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • tRNA‐derived fragments: tRF‐Gly‐CCC‐046, tRF‐Tyr‐GTA‐010 and tRF‐Pro‐TGG‐001 as novel diagnostic biomarkers for breast cancer
    Yue Zhang, Zhao Bi, Xiaohan Dong, Miao Yu, Kangyu Wang, Xingguo Song, Li Xie, Xianrang Song
    Thoracic Cancer.2021; 12(17): 2314.     CrossRef
  • Detection of secondary metastatic breast cancer by measurement of plasma CA 15.3
    L. De Cock, J. Heylen, A. Wildiers, K. Punie, A. Smeets, C. Weltens, P. Neven, J. Billen, A. Laenen, H. Wildiers
    ESMO Open.2021; 6(4): 100203.     CrossRef
  • Standardized Pathology Report for Breast Cancer
    Soo Youn Cho, So Yeon Park, Young Kyung Bae, Jee Yeon Kim, Eun Kyung Kim, Woo Gyeong Kim, Youngmee Kwon, Ahwon Lee, Hee Jin Lee, Ji Shin Lee, Jee Young Park, Gyungyub Gong, Hye Kyoung Yoon
    Journal of Breast Cancer.2021; 24(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Circular RNA circ-ERBB2 promotes HER2-positive breast cancer progression and metastasis via sponging miR-136-5p and miR-198
    Jin-xiu Zhong, Yun-yuan Kong, Rong-guang Luo, Guo-jin Xia, Wen-xing He, Xue-zhong Chen, Wei-wei Tan, Qing-jie Chen, Yu-yin Huang, Yan-xing Guan
    Journal of Translational Medicine.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques dans les cancers du sein HER2-surexprimé
    Benoîte Mery, Philippe Toussaint, Pierre-Etienne Heudel, Armelle Dufresne, Mélodie Carbonnaux, Hélène Vanacker, Thomas Bachelot, Olivier Trédan
    Bulletin du Cancer.2021; 108(11): 11S8.     CrossRef
  • Association of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors with Clinicopathological Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer
    Ali Abdul Hadi Abdul-Kareem, Qahtan A. Mahdi
    Medical Journal of Babylon.2021; 18(2): 111.     CrossRef
  • HER2 alterations in non-small-cell lung cancer – Druggable or undruggable?
    Suresh Kumar Bondili, Ravindra Nandhana, Vanita Noronha, Swayamprabha Pawar, Nandini Menon, Omshree Shetty, Anuradha Chougule, Abhishek Mahajan, Rajiv Kumar, Vijay M. Patil, Amit Joshi, Kumar Prabhash
    Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment.2021; 4(2): 374.     CrossRef
  • UCNP-based Photoluminescent Nanomedicines for Targeted Imaging and Theranostics of Cancer
    Evgenii L. Guryev, Anita S. Smyshlyaeva, Natalia Y. Shilyagina, Evgeniya A. Sokolova, Samah Shanwar, Alexey B. Kostyuk, Alexander V. Lyubeshkin, Alexey A. Schulga, Elena V. Konovalova, Quan Lin, Indrajit Roy, Irina V. Balalaeva, Sergey M. Deyev, Andrei V.
    Molecules.2020; 25(18): 4302.     CrossRef
  • Impact of the Updated Guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Testing in Breast Cancer
    Min Chong Kim, Su Hwan Kang, Jung Eun Choi, Young Kyung Bae
    Journal of Breast Cancer.2020; 23(5): 484.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Primary Rhabdomyosarcoma of the Breast: Study of Three Cases at One Institution with a Review of Primary Breast Sarcomas
Junyoung Shin, Hee Jeong Kim, Dae-Yeon Kim, Gyungyub Gong, Kyung-Ja Cho
J Pathol Transl Med. 2019;53(5):308-316.   Published online August 2, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2019.07.22
  • 5,278 View
  • 132 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
Primary breast sarcoma (PBS) is rare, comprising approximately 1% of breast malignancies. Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) accounts for an extremely small proportion of PBSs, often leading to delayed histologic confirmation.
Methods
Upon reviewing Asan Medical Center’s pathology database between 2000 and 2018, 41 PBS cases were retrieved, including three cases of primary RMS of the breast. Their clinicopathological features were analyzed, and the literature related to PBS and primary RMS of the breast was reviewed.
Results
We identified three primary breast RMS cases from our institution database, comprising 7.3% of PBS: one case each of spindle cell/sclerosing RMS (ssRMS), alveolar RMS (aRMS), and embryonal RMS (eRMS). All cases involved adolescents or young adults (14, 16, and 25 years, respectively) who underwent mastectomy or radiotherapy and were confirmed using immunohistochemical testing for myogenin, desmin, and myogenic differentiation. The ssRMS patient experienced recurrence at the operation site 4 months post-surgery despite undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The aRMS patient had multiple metastases at diagnosis and showed FAX3-FOXO1 fusion transcripts; she died 22 months after the diagnosis. The eRMS patient had enlarged axillary lymph nodes; post-radiotherapy, the lesion recurred as multiple metastases to the bone and lung. She died 18 months post-diagnosis.
Conclusions
Our experience on RMS cases suggests that spindle cell or small round cell malignancy in breasts of young female should raise suspicion for the possibility of primary or secondary RMS. To our knowledge, this is the second report of primary breast ssRMS and it may help clinicians who encounter this rare disease in the future.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Differential diagnosis of primary mesenchymal neoplasms of the breast
    Mine Ozsen, Seyit Ali Volkan Polatkan, Ulviye Yalcınkaya, Sahsine Tolunay, Mustafa Sehsuvar Gokgoz
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Management of Pediatric Breast Masses for the Pediatric Surgeon: Expert Consensus Recommendations From the APSA Cancer Committee
    Dana Schwartz, Elisabeth T. Tracy, Bindi Naik-Mathuria, Richard D. Glick, Stephanie F. Polites, Peter Mattei, David Rodeberg, Andres F. Espinoza, Sara A. Mansfield, Dave R. Lal, Meera Kotagal, Timothy Lautz, Jennifer Aldrink, Barrie S. Rich
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery.2024; : 161916.     CrossRef
  • Primary breast rhabdomyosarcoma in a 17-year-old girl
    Laxmi Singotia, V.S. Haritha
    Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2023; 19(7): 2070.     CrossRef
  • High-Grade Spindle Cell Lesions of the Breast
    Esther Yoon, Qingqing Ding, Kelly Hunt, Aysegul Sahin
    Surgical Pathology Clinics.2022; 15(1): 77.     CrossRef
  • Primary Small Cell Malignancies of the Breast: Are They Rare Malignancies?
    Kemal Behzatoğlu, Fernando Schmitt
    Acta Cytologica.2022; 66(4): 347.     CrossRef
  • Recurrent malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast: An extremely rare case of recurrence with only rhabdomyosarcoma components
    Jia Han, Shuice Liu, Akihoro Shioya, Motona Kumagai, Emi Morioka, Miki Noguchi, Masafumi Inokuchi, Sohsuke Yamada
    SAGE Open Medical Case Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Primary rhabdomyosarcoma: An extremely rare and aggressive variant of male breast cancer
    Cătălin Bogdan Satală, Ioan Jung, Tivadar Jr Bara, Patricia Simu, Iunius Simu, Madalina Vlad, Rita Szodorai, Simona Gurzu
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2020; 8(19): 4466.     CrossRef
Association between p53 Expression and Amount of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Miseon Lee, In Ah Park, Sun-Hee Heo, Young-Ae Kim, Gyungyub Gong, Hee Jin Lee
J Pathol Transl Med. 2019;53(3):180-187.   Published online March 11, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2019.02.08
  • 6,995 View
  • 201 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 15 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
Most triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) have a high histologic grade, are associated with high endoplasmic stress, and possess a high frequency of TP53 mutations. TP53 missense mutations lead to the production of mutant p53 protein and usually show high levels of p53 protein expression. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) accumulate as part of the anti-tumor immune response and have a strong prognostic and predictive significance in TNBC. We aimed to elucidate the association between p53 expression and the amount of TILs in TNBC.
Methods
In 678 TNBC patients, we evaluated TIL levels and expression of endoplasmic stress molecules. Immunohistochemical examination of p53 protein expression was categorized into three groups: no, low, and high expression.
Results
No, low, and high p53 expression was identified in 44.1% (n = 299), 20.1% (n = 136), and 35.8% (n = 243) of patients, respectively. Patients with high p53 expression showed high histologic grade (p < .001), high TIL levels (p = .009), and high expression of endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated molecules (p-eIF2a, p = .013; XBP1, p = .007), compared to patients with low p53 expression. There was no significant difference in disease-free (p = .406) or overall survival rates (p = .444) among the three p53 expression groups.
Conclusions
High p53 expression is associated with increased expression of endoplasmic reticulum stress molecules and TIL influx.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Updated Austrian treatment algorithm for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    Rupert Bartsch, Gabriel Rinnerthaler, Edgar Petru, Daniel Egle, Michael Gnant, Marija Balic, Thamer Sliwa, Christian Singer
    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.2024; 136(11-12): 347.     CrossRef
  • Triple negative breast cancer: Immunogenicity, tumor microenvironment, and immunotherapy
    Sotiris Loizides, Anastasia Constantinidou
    Frontiers in Genetics.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic benefit of TILs independent of clinicopathological and molecular factors
    Koen Brummel, Anneke L. Eerkens, Marco de Bruyn, Hans W. Nijman
    British Journal of Cancer.2023; 129(5): 737.     CrossRef
  • Dihydroartemisinin-Transferrin Adducts Enhance TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in a P53-Independent and ROS-Dependent Manner
    Xinyu Zhou, Abel Soto-Gamez, Fleur Nijdam, Rita Setroikromo, Wim J. Quax
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • New Challenges in the Differential Diagnosis of High-Grade Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Serous Carcinoma
    Andrii Puzyrenko, Chandler S Cortina, Julie M Jorns
    International Journal of Surgical Pathology.2022; 30(7): 728.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic analysis of cuproptosis-related gene in triple-negative breast cancer
    Shengnan Sha, Luyi Si, Xinrui Wu, Yuanbiao Chen, Hui Xiong, Ying Xu, Wangrui Liu, Haijun Mei, Tao Wang, Mei Li
    Frontiers in Immunology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • p53 Missense Mutation is Associated with Immune Cell PD-L1 Expression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Ai-Yan Xing, Long Liu, Ke Liang, Bin Wang
    Cancer Investigation.2022; 40(10): 879.     CrossRef
  • Crosstalk between Immune Checkpoint Modulators, Metabolic Reprogramming and Cellular Plasticity in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Arpita Poddar, Sushma R. Rao, Prashanth Prithviraj, George Kannourakis, Aparna Jayachandran
    Current Oncology.2022; 29(10): 6847.     CrossRef
  • The tumor microenvironment and triple-negative breast cancer aggressiveness: shedding light on mechanisms and targeting
    Natsuki Furukawa, Vered Stearns, Cesar A. Santa-Maria, Aleksander S. Popel
    Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets.2022; 26(12): 1041.     CrossRef
  • Intracellular partners of fibroblast growth factors 1 and 2 - implications for functions
    Katarzyna Dominika Sluzalska, Jakub Slawski, Martyna Sochacka, Agata Lampart, Jacek Otlewski, Malgorzata Zakrzewska
    Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews.2021; 57: 93.     CrossRef
  • Targeted Chinese Medicine Delivery by A New Family of Biodegradable Pseudo-Protein Nanoparticles for Treating Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: In Vitro and In Vivo Study
    Hiu Yee Kwan, Qinghua Xu, Ruihong Gong, Zhaoxiang Bian, Chih-Chang Chu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcriptomic Properties of HER2+ Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast Associate with Absence of Immune Cells
    Marie Colombe Agahozo, Marcel Smid, Ronald van Marion, Dora Hammerl, Thierry P. P. van den Bosch, Mieke A. M. Timmermans, Chayenne J. Heijerman, Pieter J. Westenend, Reno Debets, John W. M. Martens, Carolien H. M. van Deurzen
    Biology.2021; 10(8): 768.     CrossRef
  • With Our Powers Combined
    Lawrence Kasherman, Katherine Karakasis, Amit M. Oza
    The Cancer Journal.2021; 27(6): 511.     CrossRef
  • The Research Progress on the Prognostic Value of the Common Hematological Parameters in Peripheral Venous Blood in Breast Cancer


    Li Chen, Xiangyi Kong, Chengrui Yan, Yi Fang, Jing Wang
    OncoTargets and Therapy.2020; Volume 13: 1397.     CrossRef
  • Biomolecular Factors Represented by Bcl-2, p53, and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes Predict Response for Adjuvant Anthracycline Chemotherapy in Patients with Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer


    Xenia Elena Bacinschi, Anca Zgura, Inga Safta, Rodica Anghel
    Cancer Management and Research.2020; Volume 12: 11965.     CrossRef

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine
TOP